Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Jurisdiction in Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility and International Abduction]( "Jurisdiction in Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility and International Abduction")
Jurisdiction in Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility and International Abduction88,85 €![The International Protection of Human Rights]( "The International Protection of Human Rights")
The International Protection of Human Rights39,99 €![Congolese military courts and fair trial]( "Congolese military courts and fair trial")
Congolese military courts and fair trial26,99 €![A jurisdição universal dos tribunais nacionais em matéria de crimes internacionais]( "A jurisdição universal dos tribunais nacionais em matéria de crimes internacionais")
A jurisdição universal dos tribunais nacionais em matéria de crimes internacionais40,99 €![Arbitration and the Courts]( "Arbitration and the Courts")
Arbitration and the Courts18,99 €![The Dynamics of Judicial Independence]( "The Dynamics of Judicial Independence")
The Dynamics of Judicial Independence88,99 €![The repression of crimes against humanity in international law]( "The repression of crimes against humanity in international law")
The repression of crimes against humanity in international law29,99 €
Traditionally, the courts of a State have jurisdiction only over persons who have committed a crime within its territory (territorial jurisdiction). Gradually, international law recognized that national courts could exercise forms of extraterritorial jurisdiction: to try crimes committed outside their territory, by their nationals (active personal jurisdiction); against their nationals (passive personal jurisdiction); or against their essential security interests (actual jurisdiction). In addition, international law has begun to recognise that the courts of a State may exercise jurisdiction, in the absence of any connecting factors, on behalf of the international community as a whole with respect to certain serious crimes of international concern (universal jurisdiction). Yet the attribute that allows a State to dispense justice has always been seen as a characteristic of its sovereignty. This study addresses the remaining problem between the principle of state sovereignty and the fight against impunity through the implementation of universal jurisdiction.