Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Imports and Growth in Highly Indebted Countries]( "Imports and Growth in Highly Indebted Countries")
Imports and Growth in Highly Indebted Countries77,99 €![The World Copper Market]( "The World Copper Market")
The World Copper Market39,99 €![Price Effects in Input-Output Relations: A Theoretical and Empirical Study for the Netherlands 1949¿1967]( "Price Effects in Input-Output Relations: A Theoretical and Empirical Study for the Netherlands 1949¿1967")
Price Effects in Input-Output Relations: A Theoretical and Empirical Study for the Netherlands 1949¿196739,99 €![Welfare Effects of Value-Added Tax Harmonization in Europe]( "Welfare Effects of Value-Added Tax Harmonization in Europe")
Welfare Effects of Value-Added Tax Harmonization in Europe37,99 €![Factors Determining External Debt]( "Factors Determining External Debt")
Factors Determining External Debt39,99 €![Currency Substitution]( "Currency Substitution")
Currency Substitution77,99 €![Imperfect Competition in International Trade]( "Imperfect Competition in International Trade")
Imperfect Competition in International Trade118,99 €
This book contains both a theoretical analysis of (supply) price stabilization on world agricultural markets and an econometric investigationof recent sugar market policies.
The theoretical part explicitly considers the effects of protected domestic markets: It shows price stabilization to be generally desirable and provides a proof for the non-existence of rational expectations equilibria on the world market in a model with inelastic excess supply. The empirical analysis assesses the effects of the International Sugar Agreements of 1968 and 1977. Quota-mechanisms intended to limit sugar exports are found to have raised the average world market price. A reduction in the price's variance, however, is not conceivable. In general, quota agreements seemto be an inapppropriate instrument of price stabilization, as they lack a stable equilibrium interpretation. The method of analysis is time series econometrics with particular attention on unit root and cointegration issues. Tests for structural change emplopyed in orderto single out possible effects of the International (Sugar Agreements.)
International commodity markets have traditionally attracted the attention of economists, econometricians, and policy makers especially in and following politically tumultuous times. For instance, the primary commodity price boom of 1973/74 and the subsequent period of highly volatile world market prices initiated increased research on commodity markets which quickly focused on possible price stabilization schemes, particularly on buffer stocks. Simultaneously, the issue clearly advanced in priority on the political agenda, such that the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) proposed an "Integrated Program for Commodities" (IPC) intended to stabilize the world market prices of ten so-called "core commodities"l (UNCTAD (1974, 1976a), Behrman (1979)). Many developing nations welcomed the IPC almost enthusiastically, but it did not receive more than lukewarm support by major industrialized countries, apparently due to the experience with some thirty international commodity agreements past World War II2. Critical evaluations have, among others, been presented by McNicol (1978), Gordon-Ashworth (1984), and Macbean & Nguyen (1987). The most detailed of these studies is Gordon-Ashworth's, who concludes that "on balance ... the performance of international commodity agreements has been too unreliable and their distributive effects too uneven to secure the development goals that have been set" (1984, p. 284)3. Consequently, the IPC turned out to be quite controversial a topic on the UNCTAD's 1976 meeting in Nairobi and has not been able to gain any impetus since. lThese were cocoa, coffee, copper, cotton, jute, rubber, sisal, sugar, tea, and tin.
The theoretical part explicitly considers the effects of protected domestic markets: It shows price stabilization to be generally desirable and provides a proof for the non-existence of rational expectations equilibria on the world market in a model with inelastic excess supply. The empirical analysis assesses the effects of the International Sugar Agreements of 1968 and 1977. Quota-mechanisms intended to limit sugar exports are found to have raised the average world market price. A reduction in the price's variance, however, is not conceivable. In general, quota agreements seemto be an inapppropriate instrument of price stabilization, as they lack a stable equilibrium interpretation. The method of analysis is time series econometrics with particular attention on unit root and cointegration issues. Tests for structural change emplopyed in orderto single out possible effects of the International (Sugar Agreements.)
International commodity markets have traditionally attracted the attention of economists, econometricians, and policy makers especially in and following politically tumultuous times. For instance, the primary commodity price boom of 1973/74 and the subsequent period of highly volatile world market prices initiated increased research on commodity markets which quickly focused on possible price stabilization schemes, particularly on buffer stocks. Simultaneously, the issue clearly advanced in priority on the political agenda, such that the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) proposed an "Integrated Program for Commodities" (IPC) intended to stabilize the world market prices of ten so-called "core commodities"l (UNCTAD (1974, 1976a), Behrman (1979)). Many developing nations welcomed the IPC almost enthusiastically, but it did not receive more than lukewarm support by major industrialized countries, apparently due to the experience with some thirty international commodity agreements past World War II2. Critical evaluations have, among others, been presented by McNicol (1978), Gordon-Ashworth (1984), and Macbean & Nguyen (1987). The most detailed of these studies is Gordon-Ashworth's, who concludes that "on balance ... the performance of international commodity agreements has been too unreliable and their distributive effects too uneven to secure the development goals that have been set" (1984, p. 284)3. Consequently, the IPC turned out to be quite controversial a topic on the UNCTAD's 1976 meeting in Nairobi and has not been able to gain any impetus since. lThese were cocoa, coffee, copper, cotton, jute, rubber, sisal, sugar, tea, and tin.