Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![How Can the United States Army and the Interagency Community Better Define and Develop Rule of Law Doctrine and Initiatives to Include Projects Which]( "How Can the United States Army and the Interagency Community Better Define and Develop Rule of Law Doctrine and Initiatives to Include Projects Which")
How Can the United States Army and the Interagency Community Better Define and Develop Rule of Law Doctrine and Initiatives to Include Projects Which59,99 €![U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition]( "U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition")
U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition59,99 €![Headed the Wrong Way: The British Army's Painful Re-Acquaintance with its own COIN Doctrine in Southern Iraq]( "Headed the Wrong Way: The British Army's Painful Re-Acquaintance with its own COIN Doctrine in Southern Iraq")
Headed the Wrong Way: The British Army's Painful Re-Acquaintance with its own COIN Doctrine in Southern Iraq59,99 €![Leadership in Force XXI: Is The Army's Current Leadership Model and Leader Development Doctrine Properly Addressing the Challenges Brought Abou]( "Leadership in Force XXI: Is The Army's Current Leadership Model and Leader Development Doctrine Properly Addressing the Challenges Brought Abou")
Leadership in Force XXI: Is The Army's Current Leadership Model and Leader Development Doctrine Properly Addressing the Challenges Brought Abou59,99 €![Army's Gambit: Dislocation Theory and the Development of Doctrine for the Interim Brigade Combat Team]( "Army's Gambit: Dislocation Theory and the Development of Doctrine for the Interim Brigade Combat Team")
Army's Gambit: Dislocation Theory and the Development of Doctrine for the Interim Brigade Combat Team59,99 €![How Did a Lack of Strategic and Operational Vision Impair the Army's Ability to Conduct Tactical Operations in Korea in the Summer of 1950?]( "How Did a Lack of Strategic and Operational Vision Impair the Army's Ability to Conduct Tactical Operations in Korea in the Summer of 1950?")
How Did a Lack of Strategic and Operational Vision Impair the Army's Ability to Conduct Tactical Operations in Korea in the Summer of 1950?59,99 €![Army... from the Sea, the Army's Initiative to Enhance Operational Agility]( "Army... from the Sea, the Army's Initiative to Enhance Operational Agility")
Army... from the Sea, the Army's Initiative to Enhance Operational Agility59,99 €
Between 1993 and 1995, while serving as the secretary of the Canadian Land Force Doctrine and Tactics Board, the author participated extensively in the process of doctrinal change which eventually resulted in the publishing of new 'capstone' operational and tactical level doctrine manuals in 1996-1997. These manuals introduce 'manoeuvre warfare' as the official doctrine of the Army. Adoption of manoeuvre warfare came after years of sporadic debate over revision of the 1985 Combat Systems Studies - which focused exclusively upon a defensive scenario in central Europe. The end of the Cold War and the withdrawal of Canadian troops from Germany in 1993 made the operational context of the Systems Studies irrelevant, leading to a search for new doctrine. The theory of manoeuvre warfare emerged as an attractive alternative. This monograph examines whether or not 'manouevre warfare' is an appropriate operational doctrine for the Canadian Army in 2000 and beyond. The research emphasized a counterintuitive approach, critically examining the theory of manoeuvre warfare by investigating its origins and evolution in western military thinking. Four categories of documentary evidence were utilized: contemporary doctrine publications (US, British and Canadian) allowed comparison of current definitions and roles of military doctrine; published works of modern military history helped to determine the historical role of doctrine in the preparation of armies for war and the legitimacy of manoeuvre warfare as a distinct style of war; the published works of prominent military theorists are used to substantiate the theoretical foundations of manoeuvre warfare and its role vis-à-vis operational art; and contemporary Canadian policy and doctrine publications were reviewed to establish how relevant manoeuvre warfare is to Canada's strategic goals and to current operational realities. An analysis of the role of doctrine in the Land Force Management Process was conducted, using 'general syste