Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![U.S. Armed Forces and the Operational Level of War: Are We Prepared to Win?]( "U.S. Armed Forces and the Operational Level of War: Are We Prepared to Win?")
U.S. Armed Forces and the Operational Level of War: Are We Prepared to Win?59,99 €![From Recruiting Slogan to Air Force Motto: The Evolution of Aim High ... Fly, Fight, Win!]( "From Recruiting Slogan to Air Force Motto: The Evolution of Aim High ... Fly, Fight, Win!")
From Recruiting Slogan to Air Force Motto: The Evolution of Aim High ... Fly, Fight, Win!59,99 €![Fight for the Strategic Arsenal: Why the Navy and the Air Force Continue to Struggle for Relevance]( "Fight for the Strategic Arsenal: Why the Navy and the Air Force Continue to Struggle for Relevance")
Fight for the Strategic Arsenal: Why the Navy and the Air Force Continue to Struggle for Relevance59,99 €![Air War over Serbia: It Is Important to Win the Information War]( "Air War over Serbia: It Is Important to Win the Information War")
Air War over Serbia: It Is Important to Win the Information War59,99 €![Who Will We Fight? What Is the Right Scheme for Naval Aviation's Adversary Program?]( "Who Will We Fight? What Is the Right Scheme for Naval Aviation's Adversary Program?")
Who Will We Fight? What Is the Right Scheme for Naval Aviation's Adversary Program?59,99 €![Can We Get Them to the Fight? Intratheater Airlift Requirements Necessary for Army Transformation to Succeed]( "Can We Get Them to the Fight? Intratheater Airlift Requirements Necessary for Army Transformation to Succeed")
Can We Get Them to the Fight? Intratheater Airlift Requirements Necessary for Army Transformation to Succeed59,99 €![Aviation Urban Operations: Are We Training Like We Fight?]( "Aviation Urban Operations: Are We Training Like We Fight?")
Aviation Urban Operations: Are We Training Like We Fight?59,99 €
Competitive sourcing, formerly known as outsourcing, and privatization of key support activities has occurred or is underway on virtually every Air Force installation. The organizational make-up of fewer and fewer "blue suiters" represents the future of Air Force installations for the conceivable future. As the Air Force transitions to an Air Expeditionary Force, the effects of this new reality will begin to become clearer. Competitive sourcing and privatization resulted from declining military and civilian force structures, reduced Defense budgets caused by the changing world order, and the end of the Cold War. While the reason our service applies these tools is basically money, the continued implementation of them throughout the Air Force must be a very conscientious, deliberate process. If the tools are applied haphazardly, then a reemergence of the "hollow force" of the 1970's becomes a very real threat. Force modernization concerns, degrading infrastructures, high operations tempo, and personnel retention difficulties all point to potential serious issues for the Air Force.The central theme of this paper is to investigate the impact competitive sourcing and privatization have had on the Air Force's ability to project and sustain itself in a wartime environment. To do this, the study will identify areas impacted and provide the author's assessment of how mission capabilities have been enhanced or degraded because of these contractual tools and answer the question: Is there an impact as we prepare to fight the war of the 21st Century?