Using the 2000 Little Sisters v Customs Canada case as a springboard, Kendall argues that gay male pornography violates the legal right to sex equality, and that there is little to be gained from sexualized conformity.
Using the 2000 Little Sisters v Customs Canada case as a springboard, Kendall argues that gay male pornography violates the legal right to sex equality, and that there is little to be gained from sexualized conformity.
Contents Acknowledgments Introduction: From Butler to Little Sisters: What Went Wrong with Gay Male Liberation? 1 Pornography as Inequality: A Perspective on Hate Speech and the Meaning of Sexism 2 Sex Equality and Homophobia 3 Sexualizing Masculinity, Normalizing Inequality: Gay Male Pornography Post-Butler 4 Abusing Real People: The "Actors'" Perspective 5 Gay Male Pornography and Violence: Partner Abuse and Rape 6 Gay Male Pornography: An Issue of Sex Discrimination 7 "Protecting" Gay Youth: Why Self-Loathing Is Not a Path to Safety 8 Controlling Pornographic Harm Post-Butler: Some Thoughts on Canada Customs, the Police, and Judicial Bias Conclusion Notes Bibliography Permissions Index
Contents Acknowledgments Introduction: From Butler to Little Sisters: What Went Wrong with Gay Male Liberation? 1 Pornography as Inequality: A Perspective on Hate Speech and the Meaning of Sexism 2 Sex Equality and Homophobia 3 Sexualizing Masculinity, Normalizing Inequality: Gay Male Pornography Post-Butler 4 Abusing Real People: The "Actors'" Perspective 5 Gay Male Pornography and Violence: Partner Abuse and Rape 6 Gay Male Pornography: An Issue of Sex Discrimination 7 "Protecting" Gay Youth: Why Self-Loathing Is Not a Path to Safety 8 Controlling Pornographic Harm Post-Butler: Some Thoughts on Canada Customs, the Police, and Judicial Bias Conclusion Notes Bibliography Permissions Index
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
