Questioning Experts and Expertise (eBook, ePUB)

Redaktion: Baghramian, Maria; Martini, Carlo

• Format: ePub

Produktbeschreibung

This book brings together philosophers, sociologist and policy experts to discuss the nature, scope and limitations of expert advice in policy decisions. The chapters collected here address some of the most fundamental questions in the debate on the role of experts.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis
• Seitenzahl: 176
• Erscheinungstermin: 29. September 2022
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781000702644
• Artikelnr.: 64309523

Autorenporträt

Maria Baghramian is Full Professor of American Philosophy at the School of Philosophy, University College Dublin. She was a Principal Investigator of the Irish Research Council project 'When Experts Disagree' (WEXD) and currently coordinates the Horizon 2020 EU project 'Policy, Expertise and Trust in Action' (PEriTiA). She is a member of the Royal Irish Academy. Carlo Martini is Associate Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy at Vita- Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, Italy. He has published extensively on the epistemology of expertise. He is Local Principal Investigator for the Horizon 2020 project 'Policy, Expertise and Trust in Action' (PEriTiA) and the Italian Ministry of Research and Education project 'From Models to Decisions'.

Inhaltsangabe

1. Introduction: Ubiquitous Questions about Experts and Society 2.
Believing to Belong: Addressing the Novice- Expert Problem in Polarized
Scientific Communication 3. The Rightful Place of Expertise 4. Expertise,
Agreement, and the Nature of Social Scientific Facts or: Against
Epistocracy 5. Asymmetry, Disagreement and Biases: Epistemic Worries about
Expertise 6. Towards a Balanced Account of Expertise 7. Expertise,
Relevance and Types of Knowledge 8. Are Experts Right or are They Members
of Expert Groups? 9. What Experts Could Not Be 10. For A Service Conception
of Epistemic Authority: A Collective Approach 11. Can Novices Trust
Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism
12. Why the Fence Is the Seat of Reason When Experts Disagree 13. Values
and Objectivity in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change