Wrestling with God: The Courts' Tortuous Treatment of Religion - Garry, Patrick M.
21,99 €
inkl. MwSt.

Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
payback
11 °P sammeln
  • Broschiertes Buch

"In this sound, comprehensive, and up-to-date work, Patrick Garry provokes the reader to understand how the protection of speech is given far more absolute protection than religion. While this speech/religion clause comparison has been hinted at before, no one has presented it with greater clarity than Garry." - Douglas W. Kmiec, Caruso Chair and Professor of Constitutional Law, Pepperdine University "If you've ever wondered why 'free exercise' of religion has been taking such a beating at the hands of the courts for the past half century, read this book.... Anyone interested in the state of…mehr

Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Produktbeschreibung
"In this sound, comprehensive, and up-to-date work, Patrick Garry provokes the reader to understand how the protection of speech is given far more absolute protection than religion. While this speech/religion clause comparison has been hinted at before, no one has presented it with greater clarity than Garry." - Douglas W. Kmiec, Caruso Chair and Professor of Constitutional Law, Pepperdine University "If you've ever wondered why 'free exercise' of religion has been taking such a beating at the hands of the courts for the past half century, read this book.... Anyone interested in the state of church-state relations ought to have a look." - National Catholic Register "Because of recent changes in the court and cases likely to come before it in the future, this is an essential purchase...." - Library Journal "For those interested in how the courts have twisted the First Amendment's guarantee of religious liberty into an unseemly mess, this is the book to buy...." - William A. Donohue, President, Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights "Patrick Garry offers a lively and provocative critique of the Supreme Court's approach to the establishment and free exercise clauses. Garry advocates a sea change in constitutional doctrine, one that would permit the government to favor religion in non-coercive ways." - Daniel O. Conkle, Robert H. McKinney Professor of Law, Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington"