Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Ryle vs. official doctrine on how to explain an intentional action]( "Ryle vs. official doctrine on how to explain an intentional action")
Ryle vs. official doctrine on how to explain an intentional action15,95 €![Knowing God, the world and ourselves. What can the science-theology dialog learn from the German idealism today?]( "Knowing God, the world and ourselves. What can the science-theology dialog learn from the German idealism today?")
Knowing God, the world and ourselves. What can the science-theology dialog learn from the German idealism today?15,95 €![Der Zeitbegriff im Aphorismus ¿Vom Gesicht und Räthsel¿ in Friedrich Nietzsches ¿Also sprach Zarathustra¿]( "Der Zeitbegriff im Aphorismus ¿Vom Gesicht und Räthsel¿ in Friedrich Nietzsches ¿Also sprach Zarathustra¿")
Der Zeitbegriff im Aphorismus ¿Vom Gesicht und Räthsel¿ in Friedrich Nietzsches ¿Also sprach Zarathustra¿16,95 €![On Murder Considered as one of the Fine Arts]( "On Murder Considered as one of the Fine Arts")
On Murder Considered as one of the Fine Arts19,99 €!["e;Ought"e; vs. "e;Is"e;]( ""e;Ought"e; vs. "e;Is"e;")
"e;Ought"e; vs. "e;Is"e;26,99 €![The Passions of Rhetoric: Lessing¿s Theory of Argument and the German Enlightenment]( "The Passions of Rhetoric: Lessing¿s Theory of Argument and the German Enlightenment")
The Passions of Rhetoric: Lessing¿s Theory of Argument and the German Enlightenment77,99 €![Universalism vs. Communitarianism]( "Universalism vs. Communitarianism")
Universalism vs. Communitarianism27,99 €
!["e;Ought"e; vs. "e;Is"e;](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/59/59604/59604351n.jpg ""e;Ought"e; vs. "e;Is"e;")
Document from the year 2009 in the subject Philosophy - Practical (Ethics, Aesthetics, Culture, Nature, Right, ...), University of Vienna (Institut für Rechtsphilosophie, Religions- und Kulturrecht), course: Wider das Vergessen! - Kritische Beiträge junger RechtswissenschafterInnen?, language: English, abstract: Karl LARENZ (jun) - a "famous prime father" of German legal science (, as e.g. judge Prof Dr Thomas HOEREN put it in the - basically - highy-quality newspaper "FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG"? Immanuel KANT - a "world master" of thinking (, as e.g. GRABNER-HAIDER/WEINKE put it)? - E.g. WIMMER, FIRLA, HENTGES et al cast doubt on the "mode" of presenting e.g. students (almost) "semi-divine" (?) legal thinkers, often not even mentioning any of their pseudo-scientific research. Should holocaust-implications not at least cause a "stir" (of critical re-thinking) the mode of presenting "viri "boni""?