Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Headed the Wrong Way: The British Army's Painful Re-Acquaintance with its own COIN Doctrine in Southern Iraq]( "Headed the Wrong Way: The British Army's Painful Re-Acquaintance with its own COIN Doctrine in Southern Iraq")
Headed the Wrong Way: The British Army's Painful Re-Acquaintance with its own COIN Doctrine in Southern Iraq59,99 €![The Future of the Afghan Model: Unconventional Application of Conventional Counterland Doctrine]( "The Future of the Afghan Model: Unconventional Application of Conventional Counterland Doctrine")
The Future of the Afghan Model: Unconventional Application of Conventional Counterland Doctrine59,99 €![Experimental Studies of the Effect of Intent Information on Cockpit Traffic Displays]( "Experimental Studies of the Effect of Intent Information on Cockpit Traffic Displays")
Experimental Studies of the Effect of Intent Information on Cockpit Traffic Displays59,99 €![Tiocfaidh ár lá: A Critical Examination of British Counterinsurgency Operations in Northern Ireland, 1969-1998]( "Tiocfaidh ár lá: A Critical Examination of British Counterinsurgency Operations in Northern Ireland, 1969-1998")
Tiocfaidh ár lá: A Critical Examination of British Counterinsurgency Operations in Northern Ireland, 1969-199859,99 €![The British West India Trade in Early American Diplomacy]( "The British West India Trade in Early American Diplomacy")
The British West India Trade in Early American Diplomacy59,99 €![Preparing General Purpose Forces in the United States and British Armies for Counterinsurgent Operations]( "Preparing General Purpose Forces in the United States and British Armies for Counterinsurgent Operations")
Preparing General Purpose Forces in the United States and British Armies for Counterinsurgent Operations59,99 €![Deployability of the IBCT in 96 Hours: Fact or Myth?]( "Deployability of the IBCT in 96 Hours: Fact or Myth?")
Deployability of the IBCT in 96 Hours: Fact or Myth?59,99 €
In the complex modern environment, the importance of doctrine to a single national service is obvious. It is the glue that binds the military together in the face of an ever widening spectrum of conflict, ever more influential technology and an increasingly Byzantine network of international relationships. Equally its role in joint, and especially coalition warfare is fundamental to the level of integration that such a force might achieve. In the opinion of the author, those closest of military allies, the United Kingdom and the United States, commonly believe their military doctrines to be fundamentally similar to each other. This observation is based upon his experience of fifteen years in the British Army and latterly two years spent as a student at the United States Command and General Staff College. This is not surprising, perhaps as, after all, they emerged from the same chrysalis - the threat posed by numerically superior forces of the Soviet Union in Central Europe during the Cold War. Since then United States and United Kingdom forces have deployed together in high intensity conflict, on complicated peace enforcement and peace keeping operations and, of course, recently to Afghanistan and Iraq. This monograph asks whether perception of a common understanding of military doctrine really does exist in practice. Its relevance is fundamentally important to how the partners should view one another's approach to future coalition operations.