Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Toward a More Perfect Union: Matching Strategy and Structure in the Post-Cold War World]( "Toward a More Perfect Union: Matching Strategy and Structure in the Post-Cold War World")
Toward a More Perfect Union: Matching Strategy and Structure in the Post-Cold War World59,99 €![Serbia and Vietnam: A Preliminary Comparison of U.S. Decisions to Use Force]( "Serbia and Vietnam: A Preliminary Comparison of U.S. Decisions to Use Force")
Serbia and Vietnam: A Preliminary Comparison of U.S. Decisions to Use Force59,99 €![An Analysis of the Knowledge and Skill Levels Required to Effectively Support Analytical Cost Decisions in Source Selections]( "An Analysis of the Knowledge and Skill Levels Required to Effectively Support Analytical Cost Decisions in Source Selections")
An Analysis of the Knowledge and Skill Levels Required to Effectively Support Analytical Cost Decisions in Source Selections59,99 €![Preparation of Leaders to Make Decisions in a Peacekeeping Environment]( "Preparation of Leaders to Make Decisions in a Peacekeeping Environment")
Preparation of Leaders to Make Decisions in a Peacekeeping Environment59,99 €![What Should USSOCOM's Active Duty Civil Affairs Force Structure Look Like in the 21st Century?]( "What Should USSOCOM's Active Duty Civil Affairs Force Structure Look Like in the 21st Century?")
What Should USSOCOM's Active Duty Civil Affairs Force Structure Look Like in the 21st Century?59,99 €![Updating Optimal Decisions Using Game Theory and Exploring Risk Behavior through Response Surface Methodology]( "Updating Optimal Decisions Using Game Theory and Exploring Risk Behavior through Response Surface Methodology")
Updating Optimal Decisions Using Game Theory and Exploring Risk Behavior through Response Surface Methodology59,99 €![Going for Gold: A Path Toward Petroleum: Independence in the 2030 Air Force]( "Going for Gold: A Path Toward Petroleum: Independence in the 2030 Air Force")
Going for Gold: A Path Toward Petroleum: Independence in the 2030 Air Force59,99 €
In the words of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, "The United States, our allies, and our partners face a spectrum of challenges'; We must balance strategic risk across the responses, making the best use of the tools at hand within the U.S. Government and among our international partners." Examination of the propensity of U.S. foreign policy indicates that the Middle East and the radical extremist organizations which draw strength from the region will continue to hold an arguably preeminent position of relevancy. Despite the importance of the enduring struggle against terrorism and extremism, the Department of Defense is still challenged to balance strategic risks across the joint force and, instead, service parochial perspectives still drive procurement, and hence strategic, decisions. It is the author's intent to provide justification for the necessity of a holistic framework from which the U.S. joint force structure can both be shaped and help formulate a grand strategy for the U.S., specifically justified by the context of the Middle East. Arguably this framework for military force structure decisions should be part of a wider whole of government approach to the spectrum of challenges the U.S. faces globally. However, it is the author's contention that an important, if not first, step towards a broader approach should be taken with respect to military force structure decisions.