Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Four Seminal Thinkers in International Theory]( "Four Seminal Thinkers in International Theory")
Four Seminal Thinkers in International Theory250,99 €![American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers]( "American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers")
American Foreign Policy and Its Thinkers21,99 €![Social & Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Age of Reaction & Reconstruction, 1815-65]( "Social & Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Age of Reaction & Reconstruction, 1815-65")
Social & Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Age of Reaction & Reconstruction, 1815-6535,99 €![Social & Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Victorian Age]( "Social & Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Victorian Age")
Social & Political Ideas of Some Representative Thinkers of the Victorian Age35,99 €![The Routledge Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Political Thinkers]( "The Routledge Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Political Thinkers")
The Routledge Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Political Thinkers61,99 €![Socialists and the Empire: Five Years' Work of TheFabian Colonial Bureau]( "Socialists and the Empire: Five Years' Work of TheFabian Colonial Bureau")
Socialists and the Empire: Five Years' Work of TheFabian Colonial Bureau28,99 €![Ireland's Economic Crisis - Time to Act.]( "Ireland's Economic Crisis - Time to Act.")
Ireland's Economic Crisis - Time to Act.28,90 €
This book reassesses the contribution to international thought of some of the most important thinkers of the inter-war period. It takes as its starting point E.H. Carr's famous critique which, more than any other work, established the reputation of the period as the "utopian" or "idealist" phase of international relations theorizing. This characterization of inter-war thought is scrutinized through ten detailed studies of such writers as Norman Angell, J.A. Hobson, J.M. Keynes, David Mitrany, and Alfred Zimmern. The studies demonstrate the diversity of perspectives within so-called "idealism" and call into question the descriptive and analytical value of the entire notion. It is concluded that "idealism" is an overly general term, useful for scoring debating points rather than providing a helpful category for analysis.