Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![International Law Today: New Challenges and the Need for Reform?]( "International Law Today: New Challenges and the Need for Reform?")
International Law Today: New Challenges and the Need for Reform?52,99 €![Ecology after the conflict in Ukraine - will there be legal consequences?]( "Ecology after the conflict in Ukraine - will there be legal consequences?")
Ecology after the conflict in Ukraine - will there be legal consequences?18,99 €![The Nigerian Civil War and the Failure of United Nations]( "The Nigerian Civil War and the Failure of United Nations")
The Nigerian Civil War and the Failure of United Nations32,99 €![The obligation to make reparation for a breach of Jus Cogens]( "The obligation to make reparation for a breach of Jus Cogens")
The obligation to make reparation for a breach of Jus Cogens23,99 €![The Concept of Universal Crimes in International Law]( "The Concept of Universal Crimes in International Law")
The Concept of Universal Crimes in International Law31,99 €![Application of Universal Jurisdiction in the Americas]( "Application of Universal Jurisdiction in the Americas")
Application of Universal Jurisdiction in the Americas39,99 €![Towards Implementing Universal Human Rights: Festschrift for the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Human Rights Committee]( "Towards Implementing Universal Human Rights: Festschrift for the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Human Rights Committee")
Towards Implementing Universal Human Rights: Festschrift for the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Human Rights Committee384,99 €
Academic Paper from the year 2022 in the subject Law - European and International Law, Intellectual Properties, grade: A, INES Ruhengeri Institute of Applied Science, language: English, abstract: This article examines whether or not states have a legal obligation to prosecute international crimes committed abroad. In contrast to the mainstream literature, this article argues that there is an insufficient legal basis for affirming that a state has a legal obligation to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and other similar crimes committed abroad. This conclusion is reached through an inquiry into relevance of judicial decisions that have played an important role in the development of the theory of universal jurisdiction. This work demonstrates that rare decisions that held that states have universal jurisdiction over crimes committed in foreign countries were taken arbitrarily and with an insufficient legal basis.