Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Future Role and Need for Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century]( "The Future Role and Need for Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century")
The Future Role and Need for Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century59,99 €![The Erosion of US Nuclear Deterrence Credibility in the 21st Century]( "The Erosion of US Nuclear Deterrence Credibility in the 21st Century")
The Erosion of US Nuclear Deterrence Credibility in the 21st Century59,99 €![How Low Can You Go? a Study of How the Us Strategy to Develop Low-Yield Nuclear Penetrating Weapons Affects the Nuclear Threshold]( "How Low Can You Go? a Study of How the Us Strategy to Develop Low-Yield Nuclear Penetrating Weapons Affects the Nuclear Threshold")
How Low Can You Go? a Study of How the Us Strategy to Develop Low-Yield Nuclear Penetrating Weapons Affects the Nuclear Threshold59,99 €![Weakness of the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and Recommendations for Change]( "Weakness of the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and Recommendations for Change")
Weakness of the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and Recommendations for Change59,99 €![Evolution of Division Level Non-Nuclear Fire Support Coordination of Organic, Attached, and Supporting Ground Weapons and Supporting Aircraft in the U]( "Evolution of Division Level Non-Nuclear Fire Support Coordination of Organic, Attached, and Supporting Ground Weapons and Supporting Aircraft in the U")
Evolution of Division Level Non-Nuclear Fire Support Coordination of Organic, Attached, and Supporting Ground Weapons and Supporting Aircraft in the U59,99 €![Rebalancing the Nuclear Weapons Triad]( "Rebalancing the Nuclear Weapons Triad")
Rebalancing the Nuclear Weapons Triad59,99 €![The Third Temple's Holy of Holies: Israel's Nuclear Weapons]( "The Third Temple's Holy of Holies: Israel's Nuclear Weapons")
The Third Temple's Holy of Holies: Israel's Nuclear Weapons59,99 €
For over 50 years, US nuclear deterrence strategy protected the United States against Soviet expansionism and dominance. US nuclear weapons provided parity between overwhelming numbers of conventional Soviet forces and far fewer US and NATO forces, Far from being constant, however, US nuclear deterrence policy shifted during those years in response to geostrategic circumstances. The strategies of massive retaliation, flexible response, and mutually assured destruction each accomplished a similar mission - provide a deterrent against massive Soviet attack against the West. "Nuclear deterrence was arguable at work during the de-escalation of the Korean War, the Berlin Crisis, and the Gulf War. For the last 50 years, US strategic planners found the most dangerous threat and the most likely threat to the US emanated from the same source - the Soviet Union. Planning was relatively straightforward. Today, US strategic planners are faced with a more uncertain world as the most dangerous threat to US survival remains a heavily armed Russia but asymmetric attacks from non-state actors using WMD has supplanted communist expansionism. US strategic deterrence must face both scenarios, now emanating from entirely different sources.