Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Role of Extensive Reading in Learners¿ Vocabulary Acquisition]( "The Role of Extensive Reading in Learners¿ Vocabulary Acquisition")
The Role of Extensive Reading in Learners¿ Vocabulary Acquisition51,99 €![The discourse of the literary press - imaginary and norms]( "The discourse of the literary press - imaginary and norms")
The discourse of the literary press - imaginary and norms59,99 €![The question of salvation in the condemned for distrust]( "The question of salvation in the condemned for distrust")
The question of salvation in the condemned for distrust26,99 €![The linguistic heterogeneity of French]( "The linguistic heterogeneity of French")
The linguistic heterogeneity of French39,99 €![Converting Word Formation in the Comparison of Romano-Germanic Languages]( "Converting Word Formation in the Comparison of Romano-Germanic Languages")
Converting Word Formation in the Comparison of Romano-Germanic Languages32,99 €![The informative value of the left dislocation]( "The informative value of the left dislocation")
The informative value of the left dislocation36,99 €![In defense of identity]( "In defense of identity")
In defense of identity29,99 €
The author argues within the autosegmental theoretical apparatus proposed by Goldsmith that the Future Tense is marked morpho-suprasegmentally in Xibila, a variant of Changana S53 in Gutrhie's 1967-1971 classification spoken in the Chibuto District. Previous studies on the marking of Tense and Aspect always favored the morphological domain. The data collected through philological, interview and introspective technical-methodological assumptions indicate that the tone intervenes inseparably from the morphemes in the marking of the Future Tense in Xibila. Furthermore, the data collected from the informants of the different variants of Changana crossed with the Xibila variant do not prove morpho-tonological differences in the marking of the Future Tense, only phonetic.