Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![How to Get Into a Military Service Academy]( "How to Get Into a Military Service Academy")
How to Get Into a Military Service Academy53,99 €![The Lonnin Project: Making and Writing a Genre-Fluid Novel in Verse]( "The Lonnin Project: Making and Writing a Genre-Fluid Novel in Verse")
The Lonnin Project: Making and Writing a Genre-Fluid Novel in Verse126,99 €![The Ethics of Playing, Researching, and Teaching Games in the Writing Classroom]( "The Ethics of Playing, Researching, and Teaching Games in the Writing Classroom")
The Ethics of Playing, Researching, and Teaching Games in the Writing Classroom160,49 €![The Ethics of Playing, Researching, and Teaching Games in the Writing Classroom]( "The Ethics of Playing, Researching, and Teaching Games in the Writing Classroom")
The Ethics of Playing, Researching, and Teaching Games in the Writing Classroom110,99 €![On the Art of Writing]( "On the Art of Writing")
On the Art of Writing7,99 €![Genre Studies around the Globe]( "Genre Studies around the Globe")
Genre Studies around the Globe24,99 €![Genre Studies around the Globe]( "Genre Studies around the Globe")
Genre Studies around the Globe31,99 €
Recent discourse analytic studies indicate that rhetoric in academic writing (both experts and students) differs across disciplines. This study explores the use of introductions and conclusions written by second-year undergraduate students in examination essays from the departments of English, Sociology, and Zoology, at a Ghanaian public university, using a modified version of Swales' rhetorical model. This textual data is supplemented by interview and observation of classroom interactions. The analysis of these two key rhetorical units revealed some similarities and differences with respect to frequency,distribution, and sequencing of moves. In addition, there were notable lexico-grammatical features in the moves identified. Moreover, English and Sociology exhibited some differences in both the moves and linguistic features across the two rhetorical units. These findings have important implications for studies in disciplinary discourse, writing pedagogy and future research in disciplinary rhetoric at the undergraduate level.