14,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
7 °P sammeln
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Lives of the Twelve: A Look at the Social and Political Lives of the Twelve Infallible Imams- Part 3]( "The Lives of the Twelve: A Look at the Social and Political Lives of the Twelve Infallible Imams- Part 3")
The Lives of the Twelve: A Look at the Social and Political Lives of the Twelve Infallible Imams- Part 321,99 €![The Shī'a Imams in the words of Preeminent Sunni Scholarship]( "The Shī'a Imams in the words of Preeminent Sunni Scholarship")
The Shī'a Imams in the words of Preeminent Sunni Scholarship14,99 €![Removing Blame from Eminent Scholars]( "Removing Blame from Eminent Scholars")
Removing Blame from Eminent Scholars22,99 €![Treasures of the Qur'an]( "Treasures of the Qur'an")
Treasures of the Qur'an13,99 €![The Simplicity of Worship A Guide to Earning Allah's Pleasure]( "The Simplicity of Worship A Guide to Earning Allah's Pleasure")
The Simplicity of Worship A Guide to Earning Allah's Pleasure8,99 €![The Stations Of The Religion]( "The Stations Of The Religion")
The Stations Of The Religion14,99 €![Mukhtasar Hizbul Azam: The Greatest Litany]( "Mukhtasar Hizbul Azam: The Greatest Litany")
Mukhtasar Hizbul Azam: The Greatest Litany15,99 €
Ibn Taymiyyah is often seen through a simplistic anti-rationalist prism, that is, as someone with strict and literal inclinations towards hadith which he over emphasized and preferred to acceptance of broader legal theories and principles. The present text would suffice to undermine the view. Raf al Malaam an AlAimmat al A'lam is a short text in which the reader observes Ibn Taymiyyah as a jurist Par excellence. In this treatise, which has a balanced tone and is couched in erudite language, he proceeds to argue as to why a mujtahid might depart from directly acting upon a hadith text and follow his methodological principles (Usul) instead. This forms the basis of his delineating the reasons underlying the disagreements found among Muslim jurists in general and their holding differing legal opinions and proffering divergent arguments in support of those opinions.