Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Threat of Bioterrorism from Domestic U.S. Terrorist Groups]( "The Threat of Bioterrorism from Domestic U.S. Terrorist Groups")
The Threat of Bioterrorism from Domestic U.S. Terrorist Groups59,99 €![Cswmd Case Study Series 4: U.S. Ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention]( "Cswmd Case Study Series 4: U.S. Ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention")
Cswmd Case Study Series 4: U.S. Ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention59,99 €![Can We Deter Terrorists from Employing Weapons of Mass Destruction on the U.S. Homeland?]( "Can We Deter Terrorists from Employing Weapons of Mass Destruction on the U.S. Homeland?")
Can We Deter Terrorists from Employing Weapons of Mass Destruction on the U.S. Homeland?59,99 €![Protect and Defend: Adequacy of the Department of Defense Role Prescribed in the Federal Response to a Chemical or Biological Terrorist At]( "Protect and Defend: Adequacy of the Department of Defense Role Prescribed in the Federal Response to a Chemical or Biological Terrorist At")
Protect and Defend: Adequacy of the Department of Defense Role Prescribed in the Federal Response to a Chemical or Biological Terrorist At59,99 €![Playing Defense and Offense: Employing Rescue Resources as Offensive Weapons]( "Playing Defense and Offense: Employing Rescue Resources as Offensive Weapons")
Playing Defense and Offense: Employing Rescue Resources as Offensive Weapons59,99 €![Time for the U.S. to Ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention: A Summary of Events and Arguments]( "Time for the U.S. to Ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention: A Summary of Events and Arguments")
Time for the U.S. to Ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention: A Summary of Events and Arguments59,99 €![Catastrophic Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorist Attack on U.S. Homeland: A Case of Supreme Emergency Ethics?]( "Catastrophic Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorist Attack on U.S. Homeland: A Case of Supreme Emergency Ethics?")
Catastrophic Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorist Attack on U.S. Homeland: A Case of Supreme Emergency Ethics?59,99 €
There has been much discussion and debate among security analysts, scholars, and politicians about the possible use of weapons of mass destruction. This paper examines the prospects for international terrorist groups employing chemical weapons. Specifically, it argues that terrorists have the capabilities to employ chemical weapons but will be constrained from using them. A thorough search of available open literature material from books, periodicals, and the internet was conducted to compile the facts of this paper. Limited discussion with terrorist experts on the Air War College staff and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency were also incorporated into this paper. With the exception of the Aum Shinrikyo, there is no open literature support for terrorist possession of a chemical weapon. Empirical evidence does support their ability to buy, steal, or build their own chemical weapon capability. Political, ideological and moral constraints preclude the traditional terrorist employment of a chemical weapon. However, there is a growing faction of terrorists, the religious radicals, who show a proclivity to use chemical weapons to further their cause. The United States has developed cogent policies and procedures to deter, detect and respond to the chemical weapon threat. Additionally, programs have been instituted to train first responders in all major American cities. In concluding, the paper recognizes that traditional terrorists are constrained from using chemical weapons but the religious radical is not.