Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Does the U.S. Need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission?]( "Does the U.S. Need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission?")
Does the U.S. Need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission?168,99 €![The Practice of Punishment]( "The Practice of Punishment")
The Practice of Punishment48,99 €![The Reconstruction of the Juridico-Political]( "The Reconstruction of the Juridico-Political")
The Reconstruction of the Juridico-Political179,99 €![Arguing about Law]( "Arguing about Law")
Arguing about Law190,99 €![The Logic of Choice]( "The Logic of Choice")
The Logic of Choice127,99 €![The Foundation of the Juridico-Political]( "The Foundation of the Juridico-Political")
The Foundation of the Juridico-Political179,99 €![Collective Action, Philosophy and Law]( "Collective Action, Philosophy and Law")
Collective Action, Philosophy and Law190,99 €
Modern states criminalise many actions that intuitively do not seem morally wrong, particularly in the context of regulating complex industries or activities. Are mala prohibita offences of this kind fundamentally mistaken? Many criminal law scholars have thought so and argued that conduct must be morally wrong to be legitimately criminalised. This Element examines the longstanding debates about whether this idea is right, and what we would lose if we either abandoned the criminal law's close connection to morality or our use of the very useful tool of mala prohibita crimes. This Element argues that there are a range of promising arguments for reconciling mala prohibita offences with the wrongness constraint on criminalisation. Thus, it seeks to shed light on the aims of the criminal law and the moral prerequisites for legitimate criminalisation.