Multi-modal argumentation with its logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral arguments is an important addition to logical argumentation, especially when real-life situations are considered. It does not discard logic but adds other modes of argumentation to complement it, to emphasize the realistic environments of communication.
Multi-modal argumentation with its logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral arguments is an important addition to logical argumentation, especially when real-life situations are considered. It does not discard logic but adds other modes of argumentation to complement it, to emphasize the realistic environments of communication.
Marko Novak is Professor of Law in the European Faculty of Law at New University and Management and Law College (MLC) Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction 1. Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation, Jung's Psychological Typology, and the Extent of Multi-Modality to Law 2. Multi-Modal Arguments in Judicial Decisions 3. Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law 4. Kisceral Argumentation in Law: Between Past and Present 5. Emotional Argumentation, Law, and ADR 6. The Legal Appraisal of Multi-Modal Arguments 7. Multimodal Legal Argumentation in EU Trademark Disputes Conclusion
Introduction 1. Gilbert's Multi-Modal Argumentation, Jung's Psychological Typology, and the Extent of Multi-Modality to Law 2. Multi-Modal Arguments in Judicial Decisions 3. Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law 4. Kisceral Argumentation in Law: Between Past and Present 5. Emotional Argumentation, Law, and ADR 6. The Legal Appraisal of Multi-Modal Arguments 7. Multimodal Legal Argumentation in EU Trademark Disputes Conclusion
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309