Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice]( "Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice")
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice93,99 €![Court of Justice of the EU]( "Court of Justice of the EU")
Court of Justice of the EU199,00 €![The Authority of the Security Council Under Chapter VII of the Un Charter: Legal Limits and the Role of the International Court of Justice]( "The Authority of the Security Council Under Chapter VII of the Un Charter: Legal Limits and the Role of the International Court of Justice")
The Authority of the Security Council Under Chapter VII of the Un Charter: Legal Limits and the Role of the International Court of Justice283,99 €![Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes]( "Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes")
Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes131,99 €![Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act]( "Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act")
Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act133,99 €![The Reasoning State]( "The Reasoning State")
The Reasoning State102,99 €![The European Convention on Human Rights]( "The European Convention on Human Rights")
The European Convention on Human Rights50,99 €
Gerard Conway provides those working in the fields of EU law or policy with a new and critical argument about how the European Court of Justice should engage in legal reasoning which will help lawyers, academics, policy analysts and students critique how the ECJ carries out its function.
The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.
The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.
'Conway's study is timely, well argued, intelligent and provocative ... [His] highly intelligent book provides an excellent entry to the study of the decision making of the Court of Justice. He shows that the Court has a predisposition towards a meta-communautaire reading of the treaties in those cases where it matters most.' Gunnar Beck, International and Comparative Law Quarterly