Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Computer-Simulated Experiment as Teaching Strategy in Secondary School]( "Computer-Simulated Experiment as Teaching Strategy in Secondary School")
Computer-Simulated Experiment as Teaching Strategy in Secondary School27,99 €![Impact of School Physical Infrastructure on Learning Outcomes]( "Impact of School Physical Infrastructure on Learning Outcomes")
Impact of School Physical Infrastructure on Learning Outcomes53,99 €![THE TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH]( "THE TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH")
THE TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH26,99 €![Interactive Direct Teaching Based on Constructivist Learning (IDTBCL)]( "Interactive Direct Teaching Based on Constructivist Learning (IDTBCL)")
Interactive Direct Teaching Based on Constructivist Learning (IDTBCL)19,99 €![The student affairs strategy of Secondary school in Thailand]( "The student affairs strategy of Secondary school in Thailand")
The student affairs strategy of Secondary school in Thailand26,99 €![The Role of TPRS Method in Teaching Vocabulary to the 5TH Grades]( "The Role of TPRS Method in Teaching Vocabulary to the 5TH Grades")
The Role of TPRS Method in Teaching Vocabulary to the 5TH Grades32,99 €![Quality of Primary Education and the Role of Private and Public School]( "Quality of Primary Education and the Role of Private and Public School")
Quality of Primary Education and the Role of Private and Public School23,99 €
The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative effects of Constructivist-Based Teaching Method (CBTM) and the Traditional Teaching Method (TTM) on Grade 11 Mathematics learners' errors in algebra. The constructivist learning theory (CLT) was used to frame this study. Mainly, CLT was used to influence the design of CBTI to hone participants' errors in algebra that militate against their performance in Mathematics. The study was conducted in the Mpumalanga Province of South Africa with a four-week intervention programme in each of the two participating secondary schools. Participants consisted of n=78 Grade 11 Mathematics learners and one Grade 11 Mathematics teacher. A non-equivalent control group design consisting of a pre-test and post-test measure was employed. The Grade 11 teacher in the control school employed the TTM while the researcher implemented CBTM in the experimental school.