The idea that there is a fundamental rift between researchers and practitioners should not come as a surprise to anyone familiar with the current literature, trends, and general feelings in the field of clinical psychology. Central to this scientist-practitioner gap is an underlying disagreement over the nature of knowledge, namely that while researchers point to empirical studies as the foundation of truth, many practitioners would argue that clinical experience offers a more complete understanding of a topic. And while research findings can often seem irrelevant and counter-intuitive to the…mehr
The idea that there is a fundamental rift between researchers and practitioners should not come as a surprise to anyone familiar with the current literature, trends, and general feelings in the field of clinical psychology. Central to this scientist-practitioner gap is an underlying disagreement over the nature of knowledge, namely that while researchers point to empirical studies as the foundation of truth, many practitioners would argue that clinical experience offers a more complete understanding of a topic. And while research findings can often seem irrelevant and counter-intuitive to the seasoned therapist in session with a client, the subjective and un-founded methods of many practitioners can appear misguided to an empirically-minded scientist. The fact that members of one 'camp' or the other generally spend little time and effort attempting to familiarize themselves with the theory, practice, and merits of their counterparts only perpetuates this distinct line, further widening this schism.
Scott O. Lilienfeld, Ph.D., is associate professor in the Department of Psychology at Emory University and a past president of the Society for a Science of Clinical Psychology. He is founder and editor-in-chief of The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, and sits on the editorial boards of nine other publications, including Clinical Psychology Review, Psychological Assessment, and Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. William T. O'Donohue, Ph.D., is a full professor in the Department of Psychology and honorary associate professor of philosophy, at the University of Nevada at Reno. He is director of the university's Victims of Crimes Treatment Center, and also its Sexual Assault Prevention and Counseling Services.
Inhaltsangabe
Foreword. About the Editors. Contributors. Introduction. How to Think Clearly About Clinical Science. O¿Donohue Lilienfeld Fowler Science is an Essential Safeguard Against Human Error. Ruscio The Clinician as Subject. Faust Decision Research Can Increase the Accuracy of Clinical Judgment and Thereby Improve Patient Care. Wood Garb Nezworski Psychometrics. Blashfield Burgess Classification Provides an Essential Basis for Organizing Mental Disorders. Paul Psychotherapy Outcome Can Be Studied Scientifically. Lazarus Davison Clinical Case Studies are Important in the Science and Practice of Psychotherapy. Cummings Treatment and Assessment Take Place in an Economic Context Always. The Great Paradigms of Clinical Science.Timberlake Evolution-Based Learning Mechanisms Can Contribute to Adaptive and Problematic Behavior. Waldman Behavior Genetic Approaches are Integral for Understanding the Etiology of Psychopathology. Siegert Ward Evolutionary Theory Provides a Framework for Understanding Abnormal Behavior. Harkness Personality Traits are Essential for a Complete Clinical Science. Ilardi Rand Karwoski The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective Allows Us to Understand Abnormal Behavior at Multiple Levels of Complexity. The Great Cross-cutting Perspective of Clinical Science. Tully Goodman Early Developmental Processes Inform the Study of Mental Disorders. Schneiderman Siegel Mental and Physical Health Influence Each Other. Lynn Hallquist Williams Matthews Lilienfeld Some Forms of Psychopathology are Partly Socially Constructed. Chentsova-Dutton Tsai Cultural Factors Influence the Expression of Psychopathology. Lilienfeld O'Donohue The Great Ideas of Clinical Science Redux: Revisiting Our Intellectual Roots. Index
Foreword. About the Editors. Contributors. Introduction. How to Think Clearly About Clinical Science. O¿Donohue Lilienfeld Fowler Science is an Essential Safeguard Against Human Error. Ruscio The Clinician as Subject. Faust Decision Research Can Increase the Accuracy of Clinical Judgment and Thereby Improve Patient Care. Wood Garb Nezworski Psychometrics. Blashfield Burgess Classification Provides an Essential Basis for Organizing Mental Disorders. Paul Psychotherapy Outcome Can Be Studied Scientifically. Lazarus Davison Clinical Case Studies are Important in the Science and Practice of Psychotherapy. Cummings Treatment and Assessment Take Place in an Economic Context Always. The Great Paradigms of Clinical Science.Timberlake Evolution-Based Learning Mechanisms Can Contribute to Adaptive and Problematic Behavior. Waldman Behavior Genetic Approaches are Integral for Understanding the Etiology of Psychopathology. Siegert Ward Evolutionary Theory Provides a Framework for Understanding Abnormal Behavior. Harkness Personality Traits are Essential for a Complete Clinical Science. Ilardi Rand Karwoski The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective Allows Us to Understand Abnormal Behavior at Multiple Levels of Complexity. The Great Cross-cutting Perspective of Clinical Science. Tully Goodman Early Developmental Processes Inform the Study of Mental Disorders. Schneiderman Siegel Mental and Physical Health Influence Each Other. Lynn Hallquist Williams Matthews Lilienfeld Some Forms of Psychopathology are Partly Socially Constructed. Chentsova-Dutton Tsai Cultural Factors Influence the Expression of Psychopathology. Lilienfeld O'Donohue The Great Ideas of Clinical Science Redux: Revisiting Our Intellectual Roots. Index
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
