Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Reshoring. Convergence of Technological Innovations that Support a Business Case for Repatriating Offshored Electronics Production]( "Reshoring. Convergence of Technological Innovations that Support a Business Case for Repatriating Offshored Electronics Production")
Reshoring. Convergence of Technological Innovations that Support a Business Case for Repatriating Offshored Electronics Production18,95 €![Technological innovations and human resources]( "Technological innovations and human resources")
Technological innovations and human resources26,99 €![The Efficiency of the Transparency Directive and its Amending Directive 2013/50/EU (TDAD) with the Financial Disclosure Regulation]( "The Efficiency of the Transparency Directive and its Amending Directive 2013/50/EU (TDAD) with the Financial Disclosure Regulation")
The Efficiency of the Transparency Directive and its Amending Directive 2013/50/EU (TDAD) with the Financial Disclosure Regulation9,99 €![Internal control systems within the framework of the 8th EU directive]( "Internal control systems within the framework of the 8th EU directive")
Internal control systems within the framework of the 8th EU directive47,95 €![Der EU-Richtlinienentwurf zur "e;Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive"e; (CSRD). Inhalte, Auswirkungen und ex-ante Konformität der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung im DAX 40]( "Der EU-Richtlinienentwurf zur "e;Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive"e; (CSRD). Inhalte, Auswirkungen und ex-ante Konformität der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung im DAX 40")
Der EU-Richtlinienentwurf zur "e;Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive"e; (CSRD). Inhalte, Auswirkungen und ex-ante Konformität der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung im DAX 4047,95 €![EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive. Art. 7 und 8 im Hinblick auf die Vorschriften der deutschen Hinzurechnungsbesteuerung]( "EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive. Art. 7 und 8 im Hinblick auf die Vorschriften der deutschen Hinzurechnungsbesteuerung")
EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive. Art. 7 und 8 im Hinblick auf die Vorschriften der deutschen Hinzurechnungsbesteuerung18,95 €![Article 5 of the Directive on the Energy Performance Buildings (EPBD). Eine Analyse der "e;Cost-Optimal-Level"e;-Berechnungsmethode]( "Article 5 of the Directive on the Energy Performance Buildings (EPBD). Eine Analyse der "e;Cost-Optimal-Level"e;-Berechnungsmethode")
Article 5 of the Directive on the Energy Performance Buildings (EPBD). Eine Analyse der "e;Cost-Optimal-Level"e;-Berechnungsmethode42,95 €
![Der EU-Richtlinienentwurf zur "e;Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive"e; (CSRD). Inhalte, Auswirkungen und ex-ante Konformität der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung im DAX 40](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/68/68768/68768751n.jpg "Der EU-Richtlinienentwurf zur "e;Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive"e; (CSRD). Inhalte, Auswirkungen und ex-ante Konformität der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung im DAX 40")
![Article 5 of the Directive on the Energy Performance Buildings (EPBD). Eine Analyse der "e;Cost-Optimal-Level"e;-Berechnungsmethode](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/43/43374/43374891n.jpg "Article 5 of the Directive on the Energy Performance Buildings (EPBD). Eine Analyse der "e;Cost-Optimal-Level"e;-Berechnungsmethode")
Magisterarbeit aus dem Jahr 2002 im Fachbereich BWL - Beschaffung, Produktion, Logistik, Note: 1,0, Linköping University (Institute of Technology), Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Inhaltsangabe:Abstract:
Cultural industries, like the sector dedicated to the production of media content, have long been marginal in academic research, arguably because they do not fit pure concepts of the economical, the socio-political, nor the cultural. This relative neglect is in stark contrast to the omnipresence of audio-visual media services in many daily lifes, and the cultural and political significance of such information imparted as media content. These information services fulfil crucial functions for communication, education, inspiration, recreation and entertainment.
It also contrasts with the economic dynamism of the sector. In the last two decades, the sector has gone through a wave of mergers and acquisitions during the 1980s and 1990s leading to a concentration of ownership to international corporations . The sector is further characterised by technological change, in particular due to the diffusion and development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) applications. Meanwhile, initial efforts to conduct cultural accounting from the late 1980s onwards provided evidence that the production and distribution of information as media content accounts a) for a significant part of GNP and employment in most industrialised countries, and b) has tended to expand more rapidly than economies as a whole, i.e. has been a source of economic growth and job creation. Not least for EU policy makers, media content came to be seen as one of the growth sectors in a prospective Information Society (IS) where digital information networks unfold their benefits in the context of a globalising, competitive economy.
The transition to a new global media landscape that makes full use of ICT and would become one cornerstone of an IS, has the potential to affect competitiveness, change the global division of labour and the division of profits from cultural production. It is not entirely surprising then, that the media sector is in turmoil at the moment. Currently, even some of the triumphant international media conglomerates that emerged out of the wave of mergers , are experiencing highly publicised difficulties. At the same time, the expected benefits of the Information Society have not arrived as swiftly as had sometimes been predicted.
These challenges sustain a controversial debate on policy, in particular on the handling of intellectual property rights (IPR). Much of this discourse has crystallised around the music industry and the regulation of copyrights. With the Directive ( ) on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society of 22 May 2001 (the Directive), the EU has begun to regulate central issues of copyrights on the supra-national Union level. The explicit objective is the promotion of innovation and creativity by a stronger copyright regime throughout the EU. The main research question to be tackled here is, whether this Directive on copyrights in the IS is coherent with the objectives in the regulated sector specified by policy-makers.
An attempt is made to answer this question on the basis of economic literature on systems of innovation (SI). The specific focus is on intermediaries in the economic sector preoccupied with the production and distribution of recorded popular music on phonograms, and the significance of technological change and EU copyright policy for them.
Inhaltsverzeichnis:Table of Contents:
I.Introduction1
I.2Terminology3
I.3Methodology5
I.3.1Policy orientation5
I.3.2Case selection the exemplary phonogram industry6
I.3.3Explorative and qualitative research methods7
I.3.3.1Data collection and handling9
I.3.3.1.1Data collection9
I.3.3.1.2Data...
Cultural industries, like the sector dedicated to the production of media content, have long been marginal in academic research, arguably because they do not fit pure concepts of the economical, the socio-political, nor the cultural. This relative neglect is in stark contrast to the omnipresence of audio-visual media services in many daily lifes, and the cultural and political significance of such information imparted as media content. These information services fulfil crucial functions for communication, education, inspiration, recreation and entertainment.
It also contrasts with the economic dynamism of the sector. In the last two decades, the sector has gone through a wave of mergers and acquisitions during the 1980s and 1990s leading to a concentration of ownership to international corporations . The sector is further characterised by technological change, in particular due to the diffusion and development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) applications. Meanwhile, initial efforts to conduct cultural accounting from the late 1980s onwards provided evidence that the production and distribution of information as media content accounts a) for a significant part of GNP and employment in most industrialised countries, and b) has tended to expand more rapidly than economies as a whole, i.e. has been a source of economic growth and job creation. Not least for EU policy makers, media content came to be seen as one of the growth sectors in a prospective Information Society (IS) where digital information networks unfold their benefits in the context of a globalising, competitive economy.
The transition to a new global media landscape that makes full use of ICT and would become one cornerstone of an IS, has the potential to affect competitiveness, change the global division of labour and the division of profits from cultural production. It is not entirely surprising then, that the media sector is in turmoil at the moment. Currently, even some of the triumphant international media conglomerates that emerged out of the wave of mergers , are experiencing highly publicised difficulties. At the same time, the expected benefits of the Information Society have not arrived as swiftly as had sometimes been predicted.
These challenges sustain a controversial debate on policy, in particular on the handling of intellectual property rights (IPR). Much of this discourse has crystallised around the music industry and the regulation of copyrights. With the Directive ( ) on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society of 22 May 2001 (the Directive), the EU has begun to regulate central issues of copyrights on the supra-national Union level. The explicit objective is the promotion of innovation and creativity by a stronger copyright regime throughout the EU. The main research question to be tackled here is, whether this Directive on copyrights in the IS is coherent with the objectives in the regulated sector specified by policy-makers.
An attempt is made to answer this question on the basis of economic literature on systems of innovation (SI). The specific focus is on intermediaries in the economic sector preoccupied with the production and distribution of recorded popular music on phonograms, and the significance of technological change and EU copyright policy for them.
Inhaltsverzeichnis:Table of Contents:
I.Introduction1
I.2Terminology3
I.3Methodology5
I.3.1Policy orientation5
I.3.2Case selection the exemplary phonogram industry6
I.3.3Explorative and qualitative research methods7
I.3.3.1Data collection and handling9
I.3.3.1.1Data collection9
I.3.3.1.2Data...