Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Force Module Six: A Perfect Job for Air Reserve Component Contingency Response Elements]( "Force Module Six: A Perfect Job for Air Reserve Component Contingency Response Elements")
Force Module Six: A Perfect Job for Air Reserve Component Contingency Response Elements59,99 €![Options Organizing the Tanker Airlift Control Center Flight Dispatch Function: An Exploratory Concept Study]( "Options Organizing the Tanker Airlift Control Center Flight Dispatch Function: An Exploratory Concept Study")
Options Organizing the Tanker Airlift Control Center Flight Dispatch Function: An Exploratory Concept Study59,99 €![Beyond Contingency Response Groups: Air Traffic Control and the Theater Air Control System]( "Beyond Contingency Response Groups: Air Traffic Control and the Theater Air Control System")
Beyond Contingency Response Groups: Air Traffic Control and the Theater Air Control System59,99 €![Contingency Response Groups: An Analysis of Maintenance Training]( "Contingency Response Groups: An Analysis of Maintenance Training")
Contingency Response Groups: An Analysis of Maintenance Training59,99 €![Strategic Airpower Elements in Interwar German Air Force Doctrine]( "Strategic Airpower Elements in Interwar German Air Force Doctrine")
Strategic Airpower Elements in Interwar German Air Force Doctrine59,99 €![Strategic Airpower Elements in Interwar German Air Force Doctrine]( "Strategic Airpower Elements in Interwar German Air Force Doctrine")
Strategic Airpower Elements in Interwar German Air Force Doctrine59,99 €![Icaf Case Study 2: The Iron Triangle Manifested U.S. Air Force Tanker Lease 2001-2005]( "Icaf Case Study 2: The Iron Triangle Manifested U.S. Air Force Tanker Lease 2001-2005")
Icaf Case Study 2: The Iron Triangle Manifested U.S. Air Force Tanker Lease 2001-200559,99 €
The Air Force has created Contingency Response Units (CRUs) without fully exploring the ramifications such units could have to existing air mobility support doctrine. The purpose of this paper is to determine if the Air Force should change its operational level doctrine about the support of mobility air forces. Various issues are addressed in the paper to develop a conclusion, specifically, the capabilities of both types of Mobility Support Forces (MSFs) in the form of the CRU and Air Mobility Command Tanker Airlift Control Elements (AMC TALCEs), the reasons behind the development of the CRUs, and possible alternate solutions for MSF force structure. Research consisted of a Delphi Technique to collect data in the form of interviews with selected experts familiar with the CRU issues from various Air Force Major Commands. The paper concludes that Air Force operational level doctrine does need to change, however, Air Force leadership must determine first both a strategy and structure for MSFs. Only if this is accomplished will the confusion about the roles of MSFs in the CRUs and AMC TALCEs be eradicated.