Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Tactical Mobility of the Medium Weight Force in Urban Terrain]( "Tactical Mobility of the Medium Weight Force in Urban Terrain")
Tactical Mobility of the Medium Weight Force in Urban Terrain59,99 €![Is a Change in the Tactical Training of Marine Corps Attack Helicopter Pilots Essential to Perform the Anti-Armor Mission?]( "Is a Change in the Tactical Training of Marine Corps Attack Helicopter Pilots Essential to Perform the Anti-Armor Mission?")
Is a Change in the Tactical Training of Marine Corps Attack Helicopter Pilots Essential to Perform the Anti-Armor Mission?59,99 €![Robin Olds: Leadership in the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing]( "Robin Olds: Leadership in the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing")
Robin Olds: Leadership in the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing59,99 €![Attack on the American Embassy During TET, 1968: Factors That Turned a Tactical Victory Into a Political Defeat]( "Attack on the American Embassy During TET, 1968: Factors That Turned a Tactical Victory Into a Political Defeat")
Attack on the American Embassy During TET, 1968: Factors That Turned a Tactical Victory Into a Political Defeat59,99 €![Army Tactical Missile System and Fixed-Wing Aircraft Capabilities in the Joint Time-Sensitive Targeting Process]( "Army Tactical Missile System and Fixed-Wing Aircraft Capabilities in the Joint Time-Sensitive Targeting Process")
Army Tactical Missile System and Fixed-Wing Aircraft Capabilities in the Joint Time-Sensitive Targeting Process59,99 €![Tactical Observations from the Grozny Combat Experience]( "Tactical Observations from the Grozny Combat Experience")
Tactical Observations from the Grozny Combat Experience59,99 €![P.S. Bond, the Clausewitz of Combat Engineering: Does Assured Mobility Follow his Principles?]( "P.S. Bond, the Clausewitz of Combat Engineering: Does Assured Mobility Follow his Principles?")
P.S. Bond, the Clausewitz of Combat Engineering: Does Assured Mobility Follow his Principles?59,99 €
This monograph analyzes the concept of an in-stride breach of an obstacle by a tactical maneuver force. Its focus is on a historical and current review of the tactical doctrines of the U.S. and Soviet armies development of tactics, equipment, and force structure to execute an in-stride breach of an obstacle concurrent to sustaining the momentum of a maneuver force. Given the friction of terrain and combined arms operations, the paper seeks to answer whether the in-stride obstacle breach is possible for either force on today's battlefield. The study begins with a discussion of tactical mobility theory associated with an in-stride obstacle breach. Historical experiences and doctrine for breaching obstacles from World War II are presented for the U.S. and the Soviets. Current doctrine, equipment, and force structure for the two armies are reviewed for analysis and comparisons. Conclusions as to the strengths and weaknesses of each army's capability to conduct an in-stride obstacle breach are made. A final section of recommendations for future U.S. AirLand Battle in-stride obstacle breach operations is presented. The paper concludes that the current mobility capabilities of the U.S. Army do not support the AirLand Battle doctrine prescribing an in-stride obstacle breach. The Soviets possess an historical and experience based total force mobility capability than can achieve an in-stride obstacle breach to support their doctrine of engagements in depth. Improved equipment development and fielding, integration of engineer mobility and reconnaissance assets within maneuver forces, and better command and control of mobility assets are needed to produce the essential factors required to accomplish the complex task of an in-stride obstacle breach.