Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Liability of the State for Unjust Deprivation of Liberty]( "Liability of the State for Unjust Deprivation of Liberty")
Liability of the State for Unjust Deprivation of Liberty26,99 €![Beyond Human Rights and the War on Terror]( "Beyond Human Rights and the War on Terror")
Beyond Human Rights and the War on Terror179,99 €![The Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty]( "The Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty")
The Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty121,99 €![The Chief Executive's military powers]( "The Chief Executive's military powers")
The Chief Executive's military powers39,99 €![The military skills of the Chief Executive]( "The military skills of the Chief Executive")
The military skills of the Chief Executive29,99 €![Jurisdictional functions of the Peasant Community of Cuyumalca]( "Jurisdictional functions of the Peasant Community of Cuyumalca")
Jurisdictional functions of the Peasant Community of Cuyumalca36,99 €![Office of Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York]( "Office of Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York")
Office of Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York22,99 €
Judicious balancing of the competing interests of civil liberties and public safety/security measures is essential to reducing terrorism. Yet, some scholars decry judicial review as an illegitimate and undemocratic exercise in a representative democracy, while others laud judicial review as an essential function to advance peace, public participation in governing and legitimating democracy s quest to reduce terrorism in regions where terrorist originate. This book seeks to transcend the debate over judicial review by sharing the views of State Supreme Court Chief Justices on what factors they consider essential to consider when balancing the competing interests. It invites the reader to engage a global discourse within the political spaces judges operate; to accept that judicial review offers an alternative to the sword and is material and relevant to reducing terrorism. By focusing on the signals the Chief Justices send hopefully the public response will be to demand of leaders the preservation of human dignity during the global war on terror and beyond.