Sex differences abound in labor markets. In the United States three differences in particular have attracted the most attention: the earnings gap, occupational segregation, and the greater responsibility of women for child care and housework, and consequential lower participation in the labor market. This volume brings together David Neumark's work of the past fifteen years: in it he tries to understand and analyze the relative importance of family economic decision-making and sex discrimination in generating sex differences in labor markets. Neumark's research covers three main levels of…mehr
Sex differences abound in labor markets. In the United States three differences in particular have attracted the most attention: the earnings gap, occupational segregation, and the greater responsibility of women for child care and housework, and consequential lower participation in the labor market. This volume brings together David Neumark's work of the past fifteen years: in it he tries to understand and analyze the relative importance of family economic decision-making and sex discrimination in generating sex differences in labor markets. Neumark's research covers three main levels of inquiry. The first studies non-discriminatory sources of sex differences in labor markets; the second grapples with the problem of sex discrimination; while the third evaluates policies to combat and reduce sex differences in labor markets.
David Neumark is Senior Research Fellow in Economics at the Public Policy Institute of California, USA.
Inhaltsangabe
> Vol. 26 No. 2 Spring pp. 282-307. 2. Korenman Sanders D. and David Neumark . 1992. Marriage Motherhood and Wages. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 27 No. 2 Spring pp. 233-55. 3. Neumark David and Sanders D. Korenman . 1994. Sources of Bias in Women's Wage Equations: Results from Sibling Data. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 29 No. 2 Spring pp. 379-405. 4. Blackburn McKinley David E. Bloom and David Neumark . 1993. Fertility Timing Wages and Human Capital. Journal of Population Economics U> Vol. 6 No. 1 February pp. 1-30. 5. Neumark David and Andrew Postlewaite . 1998. Relative Income Concerns and the Rise in Married Women's Employment. Journal of Public Economics U> Vol. 70 No.1 October pp. 157-83. Part Two: Testing for Discrimination 6. Neumark David . 1988. Employers' Discriminatory Behavior and the Estimation of Wage Discrimination. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 23 No. 3 Summer pp. 279-95. 7. Neumark David and Michele McLennan . 1995. Sex Discrimination and Women's Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 30 No. 4 Fall pp. 713-40. 8. Neumark David . 1996. Sex Discrimination in Hiring in the Restaurant Industry: An Audit Study. Quarterly Journal of Economics U> Vol. 106 No. 3 August pp. 915-42. 9. Hellerstein Judith K. David Neumark and Kenneth Troske . 1999. Wages Productivity and Worker Characteristics: Evidence from Plant-Level Production Functions and Wage Equations. Journal of Labor Economics U> Vol. 17 No. 3 July pp. 409-46. Part Three: Testing Models of Discrimination 10. Neumark David . 1999. Labor Market Information and Wage Differentials by Race and Sex. Industrial Relations U> Vol. 38 No. 3 July pp. 414-45. 11. Hellerstein Judith K. David Neumark and Kenneth Troske . 2002. Market Forces and Sex Discrimination. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 37 No. 2 Spring pp. 353-80. Part Four: Evaluating Policy Responses to Discrimination 12. Bayard Kimberly Judith Hellerstein David Neumark and Kenneth Troske . New Evidence on Sex Segregation and Sex Differences in Wages from Matched Employer-Employee Data. Forthcoming in Journal of Labor Economics U>. 13. Holzer Harry and David Neumark . 1999. Are Affirmative Action Hires Less Qualified? Evidence From Employer-Employee Data on New Hires. Journal of Labor Economics U> Vol. 17 No. 4 Part 2 October pp. 534-69. 14. Holzer Harry and David Neumark . 2000. What Does Affirmative Action Do? Industrial and Labor Relations Review U> Vol. 53 No. 2 January pp. 240-71.
> Vol. 26 No. 2 Spring pp. 282-307. 2. Korenman Sanders D. and David Neumark . 1992. Marriage Motherhood and Wages. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 27 No. 2 Spring pp. 233-55. 3. Neumark David and Sanders D. Korenman . 1994. Sources of Bias in Women's Wage Equations: Results from Sibling Data. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 29 No. 2 Spring pp. 379-405. 4. Blackburn McKinley David E. Bloom and David Neumark . 1993. Fertility Timing Wages and Human Capital. Journal of Population Economics U> Vol. 6 No. 1 February pp. 1-30. 5. Neumark David and Andrew Postlewaite . 1998. Relative Income Concerns and the Rise in Married Women's Employment. Journal of Public Economics U> Vol. 70 No.1 October pp. 157-83. Part Two: Testing for Discrimination 6. Neumark David . 1988. Employers' Discriminatory Behavior and the Estimation of Wage Discrimination. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 23 No. 3 Summer pp. 279-95. 7. Neumark David and Michele McLennan . 1995. Sex Discrimination and Women's Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 30 No. 4 Fall pp. 713-40. 8. Neumark David . 1996. Sex Discrimination in Hiring in the Restaurant Industry: An Audit Study. Quarterly Journal of Economics U> Vol. 106 No. 3 August pp. 915-42. 9. Hellerstein Judith K. David Neumark and Kenneth Troske . 1999. Wages Productivity and Worker Characteristics: Evidence from Plant-Level Production Functions and Wage Equations. Journal of Labor Economics U> Vol. 17 No. 3 July pp. 409-46. Part Three: Testing Models of Discrimination 10. Neumark David . 1999. Labor Market Information and Wage Differentials by Race and Sex. Industrial Relations U> Vol. 38 No. 3 July pp. 414-45. 11. Hellerstein Judith K. David Neumark and Kenneth Troske . 2002. Market Forces and Sex Discrimination. Journal of Human Resources U> Vol. 37 No. 2 Spring pp. 353-80. Part Four: Evaluating Policy Responses to Discrimination 12. Bayard Kimberly Judith Hellerstein David Neumark and Kenneth Troske . New Evidence on Sex Segregation and Sex Differences in Wages from Matched Employer-Employee Data. Forthcoming in Journal of Labor Economics U>. 13. Holzer Harry and David Neumark . 1999. Are Affirmative Action Hires Less Qualified? Evidence From Employer-Employee Data on New Hires. Journal of Labor Economics U> Vol. 17 No. 4 Part 2 October pp. 534-69. 14. Holzer Harry and David Neumark . 2000. What Does Affirmative Action Do? Industrial and Labor Relations Review U> Vol. 53 No. 2 January pp. 240-71.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
