Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Poggean Approach to Mass Atrocities. Political Will for Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect]( "A Poggean Approach to Mass Atrocities. Political Will for Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect")
A Poggean Approach to Mass Atrocities. Political Will for Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect42,95 €![Unauthorised Humanitarian Interventions in World Politics]( "Unauthorised Humanitarian Interventions in World Politics")
Unauthorised Humanitarian Interventions in World Politics90,94 €![Indian Foreign Policy and Cultural Values]( "Indian Foreign Policy and Cultural Values")
Indian Foreign Policy and Cultural Values74,99 €![Patterns of News Consumption in a High-Choice Media Environment]( "Patterns of News Consumption in a High-Choice Media Environment")
Patterns of News Consumption in a High-Choice Media Environment88,99 €![The Prime Minister-Media Nexus]( "The Prime Minister-Media Nexus")
The Prime Minister-Media Nexus74,99 €![The Politics of Public Accountability]( "The Politics of Public Accountability")
The Politics of Public Accountability48,99 €![The Politics of Public Accountability]( "The Politics of Public Accountability")
The Politics of Public Accountability37,99 €
Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: USA, grade: 1.5, University of Luzern (Politikwissenschaftliches Seminar), course: Hauptseminar: The Politics of Humanitarian Intervention, language: English, abstract: This research paper deals with the question of how and in what ways the American yellow press - the New York Journal in particular - and its manipulated news of the humanitarian crisis in Cuba under Spanish colonial rule and the subsequent publicpressure influenced the American government in the decision to intervene in 1898 (The Spanish-American War). It is argued that it was a media-driven humanitarian intervention with numerous connectors from media to politics. To evaluate this, the explanatory links and the causal mechanism/process are made clear by connecting empirical media data to modern theoretical concepts of media and politics, such as framing and agenda-setting. The findings reveal that there were several kinds of interactionsbetween the New York Journal to the political sphere, making this case of intervention an excellent example of how (in this case, biased) information may trigger a variation in policy outcomes concerning humanitarian interventions.