Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Nexus of Economics, Security, and International Relations in East Asia]( "The Nexus of Economics, Security, and International Relations in East Asia")
The Nexus of Economics, Security, and International Relations in East Asia155,99 €![Rethinking Security Governance]( "Rethinking Security Governance")
Rethinking Security Governance180,99 €![Rethinking the Security-Development Nexus]( "Rethinking the Security-Development Nexus")
Rethinking the Security-Development Nexus221,99 €![The Energy Security Paradox: Rethinking Energy (In)Security in the United States and China]( "The Energy Security Paradox: Rethinking Energy (In)Security in the United States and China")
The Energy Security Paradox: Rethinking Energy (In)Security in the United States and China108,99 €![Rethinking China, the Middle East and Asia in a 'Multiplex World']( "Rethinking China, the Middle East and Asia in a 'Multiplex World'")
Rethinking China, the Middle East and Asia in a 'Multiplex World'163,99 €![Minimum Deterrence and India's Nuclear Security]( "Minimum Deterrence and India's Nuclear Security")
Minimum Deterrence and India's Nuclear Security155,99 €![The Dollar and National Security]( "The Dollar and National Security")
The Dollar and National Security133,99 €
Is East Asia heading toward war? Throughout the 1990s, conventional wisdom among U.S. scholars of international relations held that institutionalized cooperation in Europe fosters peace, while its absence from East Asia portends conflict. Developments in Europe and Asia in the 1990s contradict the conventional wisdom without discrediting it. Explanations that derive from only one paradigm or research program have shortcomings beyond their inability to recognize important empirical anomalies. International relations research is better served by combining explanatory approaches from different research traditions. >