Research Integrity
79,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
payback
40 °P sammeln
  • Gebundenes Buch

This book offers a behavioral science perspective on how scientific practice becomes compromised and provides recommendations for improvement. Broadening the discussion of research integrity beyond replication, publication biases, statistics, and methods, this book addresses the full complexity of the issue and serves academics and policy makers who are concerned with the reliability and validity of scientific findings across the social sciences

Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
Produktbeschreibung
This book offers a behavioral science perspective on how scientific practice becomes compromised and provides recommendations for improvement. Broadening the discussion of research integrity beyond replication, publication biases, statistics, and methods, this book addresses the full complexity of the issue and serves academics and policy makers who are concerned with the reliability and validity of scientific findings across the social sciences
Autorenporträt
Lee Jussim is a Professor of Psychology at Rutgers University, where he was Chair of the department from 2010-2013. He is the author of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, which received the 2013 Publisher's Prose Award for best book in Psychology. Jon A. Krosnick is the Frederic O. Glover Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences, Communication, Political Science, and Psychology at Stanford University. He is a social psychologist who does research on attitude formation, change, political behavior, and survey research methods. He also directs the Political Psychology Research Group. Sean T. Stevens is a Senior Research Fellow for Polling and Analytics at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). He is a social psychologist who researches the psychological foundations of self-censorship, what motivates the desire to censor others, and how moral convictions produce motivated reasoning that can distort interpretations of research in the social sciences.