Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Mass Torts in Europe]( "Mass Torts in Europe")
Mass Torts in Europe83,99 €![Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Global Perspective]( "Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Global Perspective")
Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Global Perspective120,99 €![Tort Law in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights]( "Tort Law in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights")
Tort Law in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights229,00 €![Directors & Officers (D & O) Liability]( "Directors & Officers (D & O) Liability")
Directors & Officers (D & O) Liability239,95 €![Medical Liability in Europe]( "Medical Liability in Europe")
Medical Liability in Europe199,95 €![Employers' Liability and Workers' Compensation]( "Employers' Liability and Workers' Compensation")
Employers' Liability and Workers' Compensation189,95 €![Loss of Housekeeping Capacity]( "Loss of Housekeeping Capacity")
Loss of Housekeeping Capacity129,95 €
Causal uncertainty is a wide-spread phenomenon. Courts are often unable to determine whether a defendantâ??s tortious conduct was a factual cause of a plaintiffâ??s harm. Yet, sometimes courts can determine the probability that the defendant caused the plaintiffâ??s harm, although often there is considerable variance in the probability estimate based on the available evidence. The conventional way to cope with this uncertainty has been to apply the evidentiary rule of â??standard of proofâ??.
The application of this â??all or nothingâ?? rule can lead to unfairness by absolving defendants who acted tortiously and may also create undesirable incentives that result in greater wrongful conduct and injustice to victims. Some courts have decided that this â??no-liabilityâ?? outcome is undesirable. They have adopted rules of proportional liability that compensate plaintiffs according to the probability that their harm was caused by the defendantâ??s tortious conduct.
In 2005 the Principles of European Tort Law (PETL) made a breakthrough in this regard by embracing rules of proportional liability. This project, building on PETL, endeavours to make further inquiries into the desirable scope of proportional liability and to offer a more detailed view of its meaning, implications, and ramifications.
The application of this â??all or nothingâ?? rule can lead to unfairness by absolving defendants who acted tortiously and may also create undesirable incentives that result in greater wrongful conduct and injustice to victims. Some courts have decided that this â??no-liabilityâ?? outcome is undesirable. They have adopted rules of proportional liability that compensate plaintiffs according to the probability that their harm was caused by the defendantâ??s tortious conduct.
In 2005 the Principles of European Tort Law (PETL) made a breakthrough in this regard by embracing rules of proportional liability. This project, building on PETL, endeavours to make further inquiries into the desirable scope of proportional liability and to offer a more detailed view of its meaning, implications, and ramifications.