Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Progress of Four Programs from the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery ACT]( "Progress of Four Programs from the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery ACT")
Progress of Four Programs from the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery ACT64,99 €![Betrayal of Trust]( "Betrayal of Trust")
Betrayal of Trust36,99 €![The Unequal Burden of Cancer]( "The Unequal Burden of Cancer")
The Unequal Burden of Cancer72,99 €![Proceedings--Workshop on Needle Exchange and Bleach Distribution Programs]( "Proceedings--Workshop on Needle Exchange and Bleach Distribution Programs")
Proceedings--Workshop on Needle Exchange and Bleach Distribution Programs58,99 €![An Assessment of Illness in U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas Embassies]( "An Assessment of Illness in U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas Embassies")
An Assessment of Illness in U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas Embassies48,99 €![Combating Antimicrobial Resistance and Protecting the Miracle of Modern Medicine]( "Combating Antimicrobial Resistance and Protecting the Miracle of Modern Medicine")
Combating Antimicrobial Resistance and Protecting the Miracle of Modern Medicine48,99 €![Challenges of Programs Evaluation of Health Interventions in Developing Countries]( "Challenges of Programs Evaluation of Health Interventions in Developing Countries")
Challenges of Programs Evaluation of Health Interventions in Developing Countries22,99 €
Amid increasing concern for patient safety and the shutdown of prominent research operations, the need to improve protections for individuals who volunteer to participate in research has become critical. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs considers the possible impact of creating an accreditation system to raise the performance of local protection mechanisms. In the United States, the system for human research participant protections has centered on the Institutional Review Board (IRB); however, this report envisions a broader system with multiple functional elements. In this context, two draft sets of accreditation standards are reviewed (authored by Public Responsibility in Medicine & Research and the National Committee for Quality Assurance) for their specific content in core areas, as well as their objectivity and validity as measurement tools. The recommendations in the report support the concept of accreditation as a quality improvement strategy, suggesting that the model should be initially pursued through pilot testing of the proposed accreditation programs.