Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![History of Aeromedical Evacuation in the Korean War and Vietnam War]( "History of Aeromedical Evacuation in the Korean War and Vietnam War")
History of Aeromedical Evacuation in the Korean War and Vietnam War59,99 €![A Study of the Korean People]( "A Study of the Korean People")
A Study of the Korean People59,99 €![Airpower Versus a Fielded Force: The Misty Facs of Vietnam and the A-10 Facs of Kosovo, a Comparative Analysis]( "Airpower Versus a Fielded Force: The Misty Facs of Vietnam and the A-10 Facs of Kosovo, a Comparative Analysis")
Airpower Versus a Fielded Force: The Misty Facs of Vietnam and the A-10 Facs of Kosovo, a Comparative Analysis59,99 €![Green and Blue in the Wild Blue: An Examination of the Evolution of Army and Air Force Airpower Thinking and Doctrine Since the Vietnam War]( "Green and Blue in the Wild Blue: An Examination of the Evolution of Army and Air Force Airpower Thinking and Doctrine Since the Vietnam War")
Green and Blue in the Wild Blue: An Examination of the Evolution of Army and Air Force Airpower Thinking and Doctrine Since the Vietnam War59,99 €![Big Eagle, Little Dragon: Propaganda and the Coercive Use of Airpower Against North Vietnam]( "Big Eagle, Little Dragon: Propaganda and the Coercive Use of Airpower Against North Vietnam")
Big Eagle, Little Dragon: Propaganda and the Coercive Use of Airpower Against North Vietnam59,99 €![The Korean War Armistice and The Islands]( "The Korean War Armistice and The Islands")
The Korean War Armistice and The Islands59,99 €![An Analysis of Class II Supplies Requisitions in the Korean Army's Organizational Supply]( "An Analysis of Class II Supplies Requisitions in the Korean Army's Organizational Supply")
An Analysis of Class II Supplies Requisitions in the Korean Army's Organizational Supply59,99 €
This study analyzes the Air Force.s decisions made concerning the advancement of tactical conventional airpower from 1953 to 1961. This thesis evaluates the decision- making process at three distinct levels using Graham T. Allison.s three decision-making models. First, this study examines Air Force decision-making based upon grand- strategic, systemic issues to conclude that tactical conventional airpower was given second priority to the dominant policy of strategic nuclear missions as a consequence of President Eisenhower.s desire to balance the federal budget while deterring the Soviet Union. Second, an evaluation of organizational decision-making within the various units that contributed to the advancement of tactical airpower reveals that despite the lower level of emphasis, tactical airpower was not entirely neglected.