Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Pragmatic Maxim]( "Pragmatic Maxim")
Pragmatic Maxim122,99 €![The Metaphysical Foundations of Love: Aquinas on Participation, Unity, and Union]( "The Metaphysical Foundations of Love: Aquinas on Participation, Unity, and Union")
The Metaphysical Foundations of Love: Aquinas on Participation, Unity, and Union69,99 €![The Irony of Idealism in Shakespeare's Problem Comedies]( "The Irony of Idealism in Shakespeare's Problem Comedies")
The Irony of Idealism in Shakespeare's Problem Comedies32,99 €![Role of Self- Actualizer in the Realm of Human Needs]( "Role of Self- Actualizer in the Realm of Human Needs")
Role of Self- Actualizer in the Realm of Human Needs32,99 €![Low Power, Low Area and High Performance Hybrid CAM Design]( "Low Power, Low Area and High Performance Hybrid CAM Design")
Low Power, Low Area and High Performance Hybrid CAM Design32,99 €![Seventeenth-Century English Literature]( "Seventeenth-Century English Literature")
Seventeenth-Century English Literature40,99 €![Patterns of Conspiracy and Assassination in Renaissance Italy]( "Patterns of Conspiracy and Assassination in Renaissance Italy")
Patterns of Conspiracy and Assassination in Renaissance Italy23,99 €
Present book defends Epistemic Structural Realism (ESR) against both Ontic Structural Realism (OSR) and Traditional Scientific Realism (TSR). It argues that TSR cannot properly explain what actually happens throughout radical theory changes in science; in the sense that a plausible version of Scientific Realism should, somehow, satisfy Scientific Anti-Realists concerns about the link between truth and success of our scientific theories. On the other hand, it is claimed that OSR is not a form of Scientific Realism but rather basically a modified form of Pragmatism. To that effect, it is further argued that Modern Physics does not provide convincing reasons to accept the conclusions that advocates of OSR derive from it. The book finally asserts that a Structural Realist understanding of Scientific Explanation is not possible. In that regard, it is argued that a defense of Structural Realism by No Miracle Argument (NMA) against Pessimistic Meta Induction Argument (PMIA) will be effective if and only if the NMA is formulated by the predictive success of scientific theories, rather than constructing it on the explanatory power of them.