Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Air Force Physical Fitness Program, Is It Adequate?]( "The Air Force Physical Fitness Program, Is It Adequate?")
The Air Force Physical Fitness Program, Is It Adequate?59,99 €![The Role of Squadron Commanders in Improving Physical Fitness Behaviors]( "The Role of Squadron Commanders in Improving Physical Fitness Behaviors")
The Role of Squadron Commanders in Improving Physical Fitness Behaviors59,99 €![Relationship Between Post Traumatic Stress and Physical Fitness and the Impact of Army Fitness Policy on Post Traumatic Stress Prevention]( "Relationship Between Post Traumatic Stress and Physical Fitness and the Impact of Army Fitness Policy on Post Traumatic Stress Prevention")
Relationship Between Post Traumatic Stress and Physical Fitness and the Impact of Army Fitness Policy on Post Traumatic Stress Prevention59,99 €![Applicability of the Army Physical Fitness Test in the Contemporary Operating Environment]( "Applicability of the Army Physical Fitness Test in the Contemporary Operating Environment")
Applicability of the Army Physical Fitness Test in the Contemporary Operating Environment59,99 €![A Comparison of the US Air Force Fitness Test and Sister Services' Combat-Oriented Fitness Tests]( "A Comparison of the US Air Force Fitness Test and Sister Services' Combat-Oriented Fitness Tests")
A Comparison of the US Air Force Fitness Test and Sister Services' Combat-Oriented Fitness Tests59,99 €![Physical Fitness and the 75th Ranger Regiment: The Components of Physical Fitness and the Ranger Mission]( "Physical Fitness and the 75th Ranger Regiment: The Components of Physical Fitness and the Ranger Mission")
Physical Fitness and the 75th Ranger Regiment: The Components of Physical Fitness and the Ranger Mission59,99 €![Factors Influencing the Air Force Cycle Ergometry Fitness Assessment]( "Factors Influencing the Air Force Cycle Ergometry Fitness Assessment")
Factors Influencing the Air Force Cycle Ergometry Fitness Assessment59,99 €
The USAF implemented significant changes to its physical fitness program in 2004 upon the direction from General Jumper, AF Chief of Staff. Gen Jumper wanted to improve the program to be more compatible with the demands of being an expeditionary force. He made it clear that in addition to improving overall fitness levels, he wanted to change the AF's culture to include fitness as a way of life and make fitness part of every Airman's job requirement. This research project set out to explore whether or not the AF has reached its goals with the new fitness program and if not, make recommendations to improve. Information for this project came from many sources: personal interviews, informal polls, articles in numerous periodicals, unpublished papers and briefings used to obtain program approval, regulations from military branches and memorandums from Gen Jumper. Research showed that fitness levels improved from 2004 to 2005 and many units have made fitness part of their culture. But senior leadership will have to decide if the AF has done enough or if we need to continue to emphasize fitness activities. It appears that the AF's senior leadership is satisfied with the current condition of the fitness program.