Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Decision Making Models and Kenya's Foreign Policy: 1964-2002]( "Decision Making Models and Kenya's Foreign Policy: 1964-2002")
Decision Making Models and Kenya's Foreign Policy: 1964-200250,99 €![Youth Participation in decision making and development]( "Youth Participation in decision making and development")
Youth Participation in decision making and development26,99 €![Information and Policy Decision Making in District Assemblies of Ghana]( "Information and Policy Decision Making in District Assemblies of Ghana")
Information and Policy Decision Making in District Assemblies of Ghana50,99 €![The CID Project in the Federal District in the light of citizenship rights]( "The CID Project in the Federal District in the light of citizenship rights")
The CID Project in the Federal District in the light of citizenship rights50,99 €![Strategic plan for decision making]( "Strategic plan for decision making")
Strategic plan for decision making36,99 €![Public-Nonprofit Collaboration and Policy in Homeless Services]( "Public-Nonprofit Collaboration and Policy in Homeless Services")
Public-Nonprofit Collaboration and Policy in Homeless Services33,99 €![Public Participation In Policy-Making And Implementation]( "Public Participation In Policy-Making And Implementation")
Public Participation In Policy-Making And Implementation51,99 €
Suboptimal public policy formulation and implementation often result from traditional representative democratic practices. Increasing fragmentation, eroding trust, and a complex policy making environment contribute to this problem. Collaborative decision making is a pragmatic alternative. This research explored process dynamics leading participants to prefer collaborative decision making approaches such as the diversity, interdependence, and authentic dialogue theory-based model of collaboration in decision making. Participants perspectives, variability among groups, and preferences for collaborative approaches to public decision making were researched. This study employed Q methodology and Q sample about public decision making. Fifty-four Q sorts were collected from three groups. A second-order factor analysis of ten first-order factors identified higher order views of collaborative, personal-public, and professional-public decision making. Key findings indicate participants support collaborative approaches to decision making. Collaboration facilitators gain insight into participant views of decision making. Collaboration capacity builds deliberation fundamental for democracy.