Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![AIRWAY AND ORTHODONTICS]( "AIRWAY AND ORTHODONTICS")
AIRWAY AND ORTHODONTICS41,99 €![Class II Malocclusion in Children]( "Class II Malocclusion in Children")
Class II Malocclusion in Children40,99 €![Headgear in children with Class II malocclusion]( "Headgear in children with Class II malocclusion")
Headgear in children with Class II malocclusion26,99 €![Class II Malocclusion]( "Class II Malocclusion")
Class II Malocclusion55,99 €![Class II Malocclusion : Diagnosis and Treatment in Growing Patients]( "Class II Malocclusion : Diagnosis and Treatment in Growing Patients")
Class II Malocclusion : Diagnosis and Treatment in Growing Patients48,99 €![NON-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF VERTICAL CLASS II MALOCCLUSION]( "NON-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF VERTICAL CLASS II MALOCCLUSION")
NON-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF VERTICAL CLASS II MALOCCLUSION51,99 €![Surgical management of class II division I malocclusion]( "Surgical management of class II division I malocclusion")
Surgical management of class II division I malocclusion36,99 €
Evaluating oropharyngeal airway volume in patients with Class II dental relationships with extraction vs non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the oropharyngeal volume does not decrease as a result of premolar extractions and orthodontic treatment. Cone-beam CT's were obtained for twenty-seven orthodontic patients before and after treatment. Nine patients were treated with four premolar extractions, and eighteen treated non-extraction. Total oropharyngeal airway volume (TV) and minimum area of constriction (MAC) were measured using InVivo Anatomage Software.