Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Interagency Coordination Structures in Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations]( "Interagency Coordination Structures in Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations")
Interagency Coordination Structures in Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations59,99 €![Interagency Coordination Efforts Concerning Stabilization and Reconstruction: Who Is Taking the Lead?]( "Interagency Coordination Efforts Concerning Stabilization and Reconstruction: Who Is Taking the Lead?")
Interagency Coordination Efforts Concerning Stabilization and Reconstruction: Who Is Taking the Lead?59,99 €![U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition]( "U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition")
U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition59,99 €![Reconstruction and Stabilization Operations: Field Advanced Civilian Team and Army Brigade Combat Team Integration at the Tactical Level]( "Reconstruction and Stabilization Operations: Field Advanced Civilian Team and Army Brigade Combat Team Integration at the Tactical Level")
Reconstruction and Stabilization Operations: Field Advanced Civilian Team and Army Brigade Combat Team Integration at the Tactical Level59,99 €![Train Like You Fight: The Need for an Institutionalized Exercise Program for United States Interagency Reconstruction and Stabilization Capa]( "Train Like You Fight: The Need for an Institutionalized Exercise Program for United States Interagency Reconstruction and Stabilization Capa")
Train Like You Fight: The Need for an Institutionalized Exercise Program for United States Interagency Reconstruction and Stabilization Capa59,99 €![The Reconstruction Weapon: Changing the Department of Defense Paradigm on Nationbuilding]( "The Reconstruction Weapon: Changing the Department of Defense Paradigm on Nationbuilding")
The Reconstruction Weapon: Changing the Department of Defense Paradigm on Nationbuilding59,99 €![Normalizing Executive Department Boundaries: A Timely First Step to Improving Interagency Coordination]( "Normalizing Executive Department Boundaries: A Timely First Step to Improving Interagency Coordination")
Normalizing Executive Department Boundaries: A Timely First Step to Improving Interagency Coordination59,99 €
In the past decade, DoD has conducted the majority of US stabilization and reconstruction operations (SRO) due to an inability of other government agencies to deploy and integrate. In April 2004, President Bush approved a concept to institutionalize US civilian efforts under the Department of State called the Secretary's Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS). The primary question of this paper is whether coordination between S/CRS and DoD provides a new US government (USG) capability to translate policy into SRO down to the tactical level, for the near term. Recent literature provides criteria against which to evaluate the S/CRS-DoD model: synchronized policy and authority; institutionalized organization and manning; synchronized and flexible planning; integrated doctrine, training and exercises; and resources and interoperability that enable transition. This paper finds the S/CRS-DoD model strong on policy and planning, but insufficient on implementation. The USG must move forward on connecting many outlying organizations and national security structures to continue the momentum towards a true USG capability. Additionally, a critical gap exists in understanding of this topic between the strategic and operational/tactical levels. If the USG wants this model to succeed, doctrine, education, and training across the spectrum of stabilization and reconstruction operators should become a top priority.