Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Opportunities for Women in the Air National Guard: Are We on Track?]( "Opportunities for Women in the Air National Guard: Are We on Track?")
Opportunities for Women in the Air National Guard: Are We on Track?59,99 €![Special Forces Missions: A Return to the Roots for a Vision of the Future]( "Special Forces Missions: A Return to the Roots for a Vision of the Future")
Special Forces Missions: A Return to the Roots for a Vision of the Future59,99 €![The New Militia Tradition and the Traditional Air National Guard Commander]( "The New Militia Tradition and the Traditional Air National Guard Commander")
The New Militia Tradition and the Traditional Air National Guard Commander59,99 €![Total Force Policy Making and the Air National Guard: A Way Ahead]( "Total Force Policy Making and the Air National Guard: A Way Ahead")
Total Force Policy Making and the Air National Guard: A Way Ahead59,99 €![Army National Guard: Force Multiplier or Irrelevant Force?]( "Army National Guard: Force Multiplier or Irrelevant Force?")
Army National Guard: Force Multiplier or Irrelevant Force?60,99 €![Investigation of Aerobraking to Return the Space Maneuver Vehicle to Low Earth Orbit from Geotransfer Orbit]( "Investigation of Aerobraking to Return the Space Maneuver Vehicle to Low Earth Orbit from Geotransfer Orbit")
Investigation of Aerobraking to Return the Space Maneuver Vehicle to Low Earth Orbit from Geotransfer Orbit60,99 €![Army National Guard: Operational Reserve or Homeland Security Force?]( "Army National Guard: Operational Reserve or Homeland Security Force?")
Army National Guard: Operational Reserve or Homeland Security Force?59,99 €
The Army announced in the 2006 Army Posture Statement that it had to operationalize the Army National Guard. The decision to operationalize the National Guard was necessary because the Army did not have enough active units to meet requirements for the War on Terrorism. Operationalization of the Army National Guard was a departure from the Cold War force structure. It was not, however, a revolutionary change for the nation's National Guard forces. The research initially focused on determining what was meant by the term "strategic reserve." That research revealed that numerous military commanders, both active and reserve, have used the term in reference to U.S. Army force structure. However, military policy documents and statutes do not define that term. The search for a clear definition of strategic reserve and its meaning for U.S. National Guard structure led to the discovery that the National Guard had only recently been constituted as a strategic reserve. The National Guard did not begin as a strategic reserve. The Guard also has experience as an operational force. The view that the National Guard was only a strategic reserve developed during the Cold War. After the end of the draft, the Department of Defense implemented the "Total Force Policy". That policy started the National Guard's movement back toward operational capability. The research explores the history of the National Guard as the nation's constitutional defense force and its subsequent development into a Federal Reserve. The history reveals that operationalization of the National Guard is not a radical venture for state controlled units. Rather, the Army's use of the National Guard as an operational force is a return to the tradition of state militias participating in the nation's defense. The National Guard serving in an operational role is not unique in the nation's history. The Cold War practice of maintaining separate strategic and operational reserve forces does not meet today's force demands. S