Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Controlling the proportionality of limitations on human rights]( "Controlling the proportionality of limitations on human rights")
Controlling the proportionality of limitations on human rights51,99 €![Technological Voluntarism and its aporia of legal reductivity]( "Technological Voluntarism and its aporia of legal reductivity")
Technological Voluntarism and its aporia of legal reductivity29,99 €![TAXATION: TWO CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES]( "TAXATION: TWO CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES")
TAXATION: TWO CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES29,99 €![Legal Culture, Legality and the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in England and Australia]( "Legal Culture, Legality and the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in England and Australia")
Legal Culture, Legality and the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in England and Australia103,99 €![The legitimacy of constitutional mutation through judicial interpretation]( "The legitimacy of constitutional mutation through judicial interpretation")
The legitimacy of constitutional mutation through judicial interpretation55,99 €![Use of foreign precedent by the Constitutional Court]( "Use of foreign precedent by the Constitutional Court")
Use of foreign precedent by the Constitutional Court49,99 €![Objectivité et subjectivité en contentieux de constitutionnalité]( "Objectivité et subjectivité en contentieux de constitutionnalité")
Objectivité et subjectivité en contentieux de constitutionnalité29,99 €
The rules of civil procedure are said to be "the mother of all procedures". In constitutional litigation, they apply in a suppletive capacity to the law on the Court. The central question of this work is to know to what extent the rules of civil procedure, which are fundamentally subjective in nature, are applicable to constitutionality litigation, which is in principle objective? What is the place of subjective interests in constitutionality litigation? More precisely, is the dispositive principle applicable to constitutional litigation? And does the "recourse" is unconstitutionality, constitute an action obeying the conditions of existence of the legal action? Are there parties in the constitutionality litigation? Can third parties have access to the proceedings? What is the role of the parties in the proceedings? To what extent can the decision benefit them?