Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Emerging Concepts of Mortuary Affairs Doctrine for the 21st Century War Fighter]( "Emerging Concepts of Mortuary Affairs Doctrine for the 21st Century War Fighter")
Emerging Concepts of Mortuary Affairs Doctrine for the 21st Century War Fighter59,99 €![Close Air Support Command and Control at the Operational Level]( "Close Air Support Command and Control at the Operational Level")
Close Air Support Command and Control at the Operational Level59,99 €![Advanced Data Structures: Concepts and Applications]( "Advanced Data Structures: Concepts and Applications")
Advanced Data Structures: Concepts and Applications44,99 €![Advanced Java: Concepts and Implementation]( "Advanced Java: Concepts and Implementation")
Advanced Java: Concepts and Implementation71,99 €![Historical Look at Close Air Support]( "Historical Look at Close Air Support")
Historical Look at Close Air Support59,99 €![Close Air Support - Can It Survive the 80s?]( "Close Air Support - Can It Survive the 80s?")
Close Air Support - Can It Survive the 80s?59,99 €![Creating Air Refueling Doctrine: Preserving Experience in Writing]( "Creating Air Refueling Doctrine: Preserving Experience in Writing")
Creating Air Refueling Doctrine: Preserving Experience in Writing59,99 €
The joint close air support (JCAS) community is struggling to determine future close air support (CAS) employment tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). Since 1996, the JCAS community, lead by an Office of the Secretary of Defense JCAS Joint Test Force, has tried to improve JCAS by proposing changes in training, doctrine, equipment and organization. Differing service perspectives and the advent of new technologies make agreement on necessary doctrinal changes tenuous. The primary question set out in this thesis asks, Are the changes in terminal attack control framework proposed in the draft JP 3-09.3 necessary and sufficient for current and near future operations? The paper examines contentious issues such as battlefield air interdiction (BAI), the fire support coordination line (FSCL), CAS definitions, and the purpose of maintaining separate categories of control. It then structures a qualitative comparative analysis of the current and proposed terminal attack control procedural frameworks based upon the criteria of simplicity, completeness, and utility. The evidence of this study suggests that proposed doctrinal changes are necessary, but the overall "utility" of the draft terminal attack control framework is not sufficient. This study makes five recommendations for improvements in JCAS doctrine.