Molinism promises the strongest account of God's providence consistent with our freedom. But is it a coherent view, and does it provide a satisfying account of divine providence? The essays in this volume examine the status, defensibility, and application of this recently revived doctrine, and anticipate the future direction of the debate.
Molinism promises the strongest account of God's providence consistent with our freedom. But is it a coherent view, and does it provide a satisfying account of divine providence? The essays in this volume examine the status, defensibility, and application of this recently revived doctrine, and anticipate the future direction of the debate.
Ken Perszyk is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy and Head of the School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand. His primary research interests are in philosophy of religion and metaphysics. He has published articles on a range of areas, including Molinism, the Argument from Evil, the metaphysics of modality, the history of early analytical philosophy and Wittgenstein. He is the author of Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy (1993).
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction 1: William Hasker: The (Non-)Existence of Molinist Counterfactuals 2: Thomas P. Flint: Whence and Whither the Molinist Debate: A Reply to Hasker 3: Trenton Merricks: Truth and Molinism 4: William Hasker: Trenton Merricks on Some Anti-Molinist Arguments 5: Dean Zimmerman: Pro Haskeris Contradictione 6: Trenton Merricks: Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman 7: Edwin Mares and Ken Perszyk: Molinist Conditionals 8: Edward Wierenga: Tilting at Molinism 9: Dean Zimmerman: A Précis of 'Yet Another Anti-Molinist Argument' 10: William Lane Craig: Yet Another Failed Anti-Molinist Argument 11: Dean Zimmerman: An Anti-Molinist Replies 12: Thomas P. Flint: Molinism and Incarnation 13: John Martin Fischer: Putting Molinism In Its Place 14: Greg Restall: Molinism and the Thin Red Line 15: Hugh J. McCann: The Free Will Defense 16: Derk Pereboom: Theological Determinism and Divine Providence 17: William Hasker: An Open Theist Theodicy of Natural Evil Bibliography: Recent Work on Molinism
Introduction 1: William Hasker: The (Non-)Existence of Molinist Counterfactuals 2: Thomas P. Flint: Whence and Whither the Molinist Debate: A Reply to Hasker 3: Trenton Merricks: Truth and Molinism 4: William Hasker: Trenton Merricks on Some Anti-Molinist Arguments 5: Dean Zimmerman: Pro Haskeris Contradictione 6: Trenton Merricks: Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman 7: Edwin Mares and Ken Perszyk: Molinist Conditionals 8: Edward Wierenga: Tilting at Molinism 9: Dean Zimmerman: A Précis of 'Yet Another Anti-Molinist Argument' 10: William Lane Craig: Yet Another Failed Anti-Molinist Argument 11: Dean Zimmerman: An Anti-Molinist Replies 12: Thomas P. Flint: Molinism and Incarnation 13: John Martin Fischer: Putting Molinism In Its Place 14: Greg Restall: Molinism and the Thin Red Line 15: Hugh J. McCann: The Free Will Defense 16: Derk Pereboom: Theological Determinism and Divine Providence 17: William Hasker: An Open Theist Theodicy of Natural Evil Bibliography: Recent Work on Molinism
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309