How accurate are statements about smoking habits? This book presents the results of a comprehensive review in which the literature on the subject is newly interpreted. It is shown that smokers are misclassified as non-smokers in epidemiological studies often enough to explain the increased lung cancer risk seen in self-reported non-smokers in relation to their spouse's smoking habits. This study overturns the commonly held view that increased risk is a consequence of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and highlights the difficulty of making valid inferences from epidemiological data.…mehr
How accurate are statements about smoking habits? This book presents the results of a comprehensive review in which the literature on the subject is newly interpreted. It is shown that smokers are misclassified as non-smokers in epidemiological studies often enough to explain the increased lung cancer risk seen in self-reported non-smokers in relation to their spouse's smoking habits. This study overturns the commonly held view that increased risk is a consequence of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and highlights the difficulty of making valid inferences from epidemiological data. No-one should draw conclusions about passive smoking before reading this book!
Produktdetails
Produktdetails
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. Supplement
1 Introduction.- 1.1 Objectives.- 1.2 Reasons for Study of Inaccuracy of Smoking Habits.- 1.3 Epidemiological Evidence of an Association of Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer.- 1.4 Possible Explanations for the Association.- 1.5 First Attempts to Estimate Misclassification Bias.- 1.6 Difference in Conclusions and Need for More Data.- 1.7 Misclassification Not the Only Issue.- 1.8 Structure of the Monograph.- 2 General Considerations.- 2.1 Major and Minor Sources of Misclassification Bias in Passive Smoking Studies.- 2.2 Types of Information on Misclassification of Smoking Habit.- 2.3 Factors Which Might Affect Reported Smoking Habits.- 2.4 Use of Objective Markers.- 3 Evidence on Misclassification.- 3.1 Studies Using Carbon Monoxide and Thioeyanate as Objective Markers.- 3.2 Studies Using Nicotine or Cotinine as Objective Markers.- 3.3 Studies Involving Multiple Reports Concerning the Same Individual - Subject a Lung Cancer Case.- 3.4 Studies Involving Multiple Reports Concerning the Same Individual - Subject not a Lung Cancer Case.- 3.5 Other Evidence on Misclassification of Smoking Habits.- 4 Overview and Unanswered Questions.- References.- Appendix A Studies of Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer - A Brief Review with Special Reference to the Way the Smoking Habit was Obtained.- Appendix B Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer Association: A Result of Bias?.- Appendix C Major and Minor Sources of Misclassification Bias in Passive Smoking Studies - Mathematical Details.- Appendix D Trends in the Percentages of UK Men and Women who Have Never Smoked.
1 Introduction.- 1.1 Objectives.- 1.2 Reasons for Study of Inaccuracy of Smoking Habits.- 1.3 Epidemiological Evidence of an Association of Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer.- 1.4 Possible Explanations for the Association.- 1.5 First Attempts to Estimate Misclassification Bias.- 1.6 Difference in Conclusions and Need for More Data.- 1.7 Misclassification Not the Only Issue.- 1.8 Structure of the Monograph.- 2 General Considerations.- 2.1 Major and Minor Sources of Misclassification Bias in Passive Smoking Studies.- 2.2 Types of Information on Misclassification of Smoking Habit.- 2.3 Factors Which Might Affect Reported Smoking Habits.- 2.4 Use of Objective Markers.- 3 Evidence on Misclassification.- 3.1 Studies Using Carbon Monoxide and Thioeyanate as Objective Markers.- 3.2 Studies Using Nicotine or Cotinine as Objective Markers.- 3.3 Studies Involving Multiple Reports Concerning the Same Individual - Subject a Lung Cancer Case.- 3.4 Studies Involving Multiple Reports Concerning the Same Individual - Subject not a Lung Cancer Case.- 3.5 Other Evidence on Misclassification of Smoking Habits.- 4 Overview and Unanswered Questions.- References.- Appendix A Studies of Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer - A Brief Review with Special Reference to the Way the Smoking Habit was Obtained.- Appendix B Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer Association: A Result of Bias?.- Appendix C Major and Minor Sources of Misclassification Bias in Passive Smoking Studies - Mathematical Details.- Appendix D Trends in the Percentages of UK Men and Women who Have Never Smoked.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
