Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Parent Management Training - Oregon Model to treat behavior problems]( "Parent Management Training - Oregon Model to treat behavior problems")
Parent Management Training - Oregon Model to treat behavior problems36,99 €![Senses: The Holistic Approaches to Treat Depression]( "Senses: The Holistic Approaches to Treat Depression")
Senses: The Holistic Approaches to Treat Depression39,99 €![Understanding and Managing Children's Classroom Behavior]( "Understanding and Managing Children's Classroom Behavior")
Understanding and Managing Children's Classroom Behavior84,99 €![Perceptions of classroom climate and motivation to study English]( "Perceptions of classroom climate and motivation to study English")
Perceptions of classroom climate and motivation to study English32,99 €![Teacher efficacy beliefs and classroom management]( "Teacher efficacy beliefs and classroom management")
Teacher efficacy beliefs and classroom management38,99 €![Language and Learning in the Cooperative Classroom]( "Language and Learning in the Cooperative Classroom")
Language and Learning in the Cooperative Classroom39,99 €![Advances in Motivation Science]( "Advances in Motivation Science")
Advances in Motivation Science75,99 €
After functional analyses conducted on the
disruptive classroom behavior of 3 first grade
students determined their behavior to be maintained
by negative reinforcement, three interventions were
evaluated for their effectiveness. Differential
negative reinforcement of alternative behavior
(DNRA), differential reinforcement of incompatible
behavior (DRI), and noncontingent reinforcement
(NCR) were evaluated. For 1 child, NCR reduced
problem behavior the most. For 2 participants, the
level of problem behavior was undifferentiated
during the comparison. Teacher completed IRP-15s
determined that DRI was more acceptable to each
teacher. Therefore, the problem behavior of 2
participants was evaluated further using DRI. Both
the NCR and DRI interventions were evaluated in ABAB
designs that demonstrated each intervention to be
successful in reducing classroom behavior problems
maintained by negative reinforcement. Functional
Analysis, treatment comparisons, and treatment
acceptability are discussed.
disruptive classroom behavior of 3 first grade
students determined their behavior to be maintained
by negative reinforcement, three interventions were
evaluated for their effectiveness. Differential
negative reinforcement of alternative behavior
(DNRA), differential reinforcement of incompatible
behavior (DRI), and noncontingent reinforcement
(NCR) were evaluated. For 1 child, NCR reduced
problem behavior the most. For 2 participants, the
level of problem behavior was undifferentiated
during the comparison. Teacher completed IRP-15s
determined that DRI was more acceptable to each
teacher. Therefore, the problem behavior of 2
participants was evaluated further using DRI. Both
the NCR and DRI interventions were evaluated in ABAB
designs that demonstrated each intervention to be
successful in reducing classroom behavior problems
maintained by negative reinforcement. Functional
Analysis, treatment comparisons, and treatment
acceptability are discussed.