Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Microsoft, Al Jazeera, and the Predator: The Challenge of Effects-Based Operations in the Global War on Terrorism]( "Microsoft, Al Jazeera, and the Predator: The Challenge of Effects-Based Operations in the Global War on Terrorism")
Microsoft, Al Jazeera, and the Predator: The Challenge of Effects-Based Operations in the Global War on Terrorism59,99 €![Meeting the Challenge of Caring for Persons Living with Dementia and Their Care Partners and Caregivers]( "Meeting the Challenge of Caring for Persons Living with Dementia and Their Care Partners and Caregivers")
Meeting the Challenge of Caring for Persons Living with Dementia and Their Care Partners and Caregivers63,99 €![An Examination of Air Mobility Building Partnership History and the Policy Implications for Future Operations]( "An Examination of Air Mobility Building Partnership History and the Policy Implications for Future Operations")
An Examination of Air Mobility Building Partnership History and the Policy Implications for Future Operations59,99 €![Integrating Space-Based Fires into the Joint Force after Next]( "Integrating Space-Based Fires into the Joint Force after Next")
Integrating Space-Based Fires into the Joint Force after Next59,99 €![The Operations of Surgery]( "The Operations of Surgery")
The Operations of Surgery35,99 €![Pesticides Residues in Food 2017]( "Pesticides Residues in Food 2017")
Pesticides Residues in Food 2017132,99 €![Bursitis Subacronialis, or Periarthritis of the Shoulder Joint]( "Bursitis Subacronialis, or Periarthritis of the Shoulder Joint")
Bursitis Subacronialis, or Periarthritis of the Shoulder Joint17,99 €
Joint Vision 2020 recognizes the increasing importance of operations within the information domain as well as the need to have appropriately designed organizations prepared to support and conduct operations within the information domain. This paper provides an initial framework to assess organizational structures for IO using the evolution of British and American airpower organizations during the interwar years. This analysis will show how, over time, the debate over organizing air forces became centered on a core set of criteria. Applying these criteria to IO will provide a preliminary determination of the degree of organizational autonomy warranted for IO. In a similar manner, the organizational decisions made during the interwar years had direct implications on both airpower and service organizations. These implications will be assessed against three organizational constructs: an independent IO service, semi-autonomous service organizations, and a joint unified command. This analysis will illustrate that an independent service is not warranted at this time; however, it does point to a requirement to grant greater autonomy to IO organizations within the services to help foster operational and doctrinal innovation. Finally, a pre-existing joint unified command should assume control of all IO capabilities to ensure the proper integration of the many disparate capabilities grouped under the IO rubric.