Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Comparison of Spectral Analysis Software Programs]( "Comparison of Spectral Analysis Software Programs")
Comparison of Spectral Analysis Software Programs59,99 €![Concept of Common Training: A Comparison of Military Qualification Standards II with Selected Past Officer Basic Course Programs of Instruction]( "Concept of Common Training: A Comparison of Military Qualification Standards II with Selected Past Officer Basic Course Programs of Instruction")
Concept of Common Training: A Comparison of Military Qualification Standards II with Selected Past Officer Basic Course Programs of Instruction59,99 €![Afso 21: A Comparison of Private Sector and Air Force Practices]( "Afso 21: A Comparison of Private Sector and Air Force Practices")
Afso 21: A Comparison of Private Sector and Air Force Practices59,99 €![The Quest for Commonality: A Comparison of the Tfx and Jsf Programs]( "The Quest for Commonality: A Comparison of the Tfx and Jsf Programs")
The Quest for Commonality: A Comparison of the Tfx and Jsf Programs59,99 €![In What Ways has US Security Cooperation Programs Been Effective in Helping Kenya to Build Partnership Capacity to Counter Transnational Terrorism?]( "In What Ways has US Security Cooperation Programs Been Effective in Helping Kenya to Build Partnership Capacity to Counter Transnational Terrorism?")
In What Ways has US Security Cooperation Programs Been Effective in Helping Kenya to Build Partnership Capacity to Counter Transnational Terrorism?59,99 €![Religious Intolerance in the Air Force: the Need to Develop and Implement Effective Training Programs]( "Religious Intolerance in the Air Force: the Need to Develop and Implement Effective Training Programs")
Religious Intolerance in the Air Force: the Need to Develop and Implement Effective Training Programs59,99 €![Contractor Support to Military Operations: Host Nation Legal Barriers to Mission Accomplishment]( "Contractor Support to Military Operations: Host Nation Legal Barriers to Mission Accomplishment")
Contractor Support to Military Operations: Host Nation Legal Barriers to Mission Accomplishment59,99 €
With continuing emphasis on building partner capacity to deal with internal and external security threats, the United States (US) Department of State and Department of Defense continue to increase partner nation security force capacity within Security Sector Reform (SSR). This monograph assesses whether US SSR programs, in concert with other contributor nations, fulfill US foreign policy better when implemented by US government agencies rather than by contractors. The intervening variables of transparency, effective oversight, and contractor misconduct were identified to help illustrate examples where policy outcomes are predictable based on the given method of SSR support. Several case studies test the theory and link the independent and dependent variables. Within six selected case studies, the analysis shows how the intervening variables of transparency, effective oversight, and contractor misconduct effect the outcome of the SSR effort. These case studies provide a qualitative comparison to test the theory by reviewing SSR performed by predominantly contracted, mixed, and predominantly military sources. The case studies include six countries with various types of support as well as policy intents. An examination of support to Ukraine in 2009, Georgia in 2008, and Senegal in 2009 provide examples of SSR programs utilizing a mix of contracted and US government support. A second examination of support to Croatia in 1995, Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2009 and South Sudan in 2009 provide examples of predominantly contracted support to the SSR programs. Examining the case studies with the three variables identified within the literature review resulted in an unclear connection between a specific policy and the overall outcome. US policy aims for SSR programs may result in unintended consequences, regardless of the type of support and overall unity of effort of the SSR program.