Managing for results and its relationship with budgetary programs
Versandkostenfrei!
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
40,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
PAYBACK Punkte
20 °P sammeln!
The research aims to establish whether there is a direct and significant relationship between management for results (MfR) and budgetary programs (PP) implemented by the Regional Government of Amazonas in the 2016 period. The methodological structure is as follows: (a) approach: quantitative; (b) method: hypothetico-deductive; (c) type of study: non-experimental; (d) design: cross-sectional; (e) scope: exploratory, descriptive and correlational. The sample, of census type, consisted of the entire population (40 employees) of the Planning, Budget, Accounting and Supply areas of the aforemention...
The research aims to establish whether there is a direct and significant relationship between management for results (MfR) and budgetary programs (PP) implemented by the Regional Government of Amazonas in the 2016 period. The methodological structure is as follows: (a) approach: quantitative; (b) method: hypothetico-deductive; (c) type of study: non-experimental; (d) design: cross-sectional; (e) scope: exploratory, descriptive and correlational. The sample, of census type, consisted of the entire population (40 employees) of the Planning, Budget, Accounting and Supply areas of the aforementioned regional entity. Two Likert-type questionnaires with the variables "Management for Results" and "Budgetary Programs" were applied to this group. According to Cronbach's Alpha, both surveys (the first with 39 questions and the second with 20 items) have a high level of reliability: 0.962 in the first case, and 0.926 in the second. The results show that there is a correlation of r = 0.770__between the variables of management for results and budgetary programs.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich für
