- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This book provides an overview and analysis of the term à â Ë lawfareà â â , as it has come to describe a range of conflicts in which legal instruments are used to pursue political goals.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Dana SchmalzRefugees, Democracy and the Law38,99 €
- EU Law Enforcement38,99 €
- Allen CalhounTax Law, Religion, and Justice58,99 €
- Paul RockThe Official History of Criminal Justice in England and Wales58,99 €
- Reimagining the State50,99 €
- Minority Rights and Liberal Democratic Insecurities168,99 €
- Katie BoyleEconomic and Social Rights Law58,99 €
-
-
-
This book provides an overview and analysis of the term à â Ë lawfareà â â , as it has come to describe a range of conflicts in which legal instruments are used to pursue political goals.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- New Trajectories in Law
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Seitenzahl: 122
- Erscheinungstermin: 19. September 2022
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 216mm x 140mm x 10mm
- Gewicht: 258g
- ISBN-13: 9781032267722
- ISBN-10: 1032267720
- Artikelnr.: 65609049
- New Trajectories in Law
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Seitenzahl: 122
- Erscheinungstermin: 19. September 2022
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 216mm x 140mm x 10mm
- Gewicht: 258g
- ISBN-13: 9781032267722
- ISBN-10: 1032267720
- Artikelnr.: 65609049
Jaume Castan Pinos is Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark. Mark Friis Hau is a postdoctoral researcher at the Employment Relations Research Centre (FAOS) at the Department of Sociology at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-à-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-à-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-à-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
1 Introduction
2 Geopolitical lawfare: legal instruments as weapons of war
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Why is geopolitical lawfare a popular tool?
2.3 Great powers' attitudes and strategies towards geopolitical lawfare
2.3.1 The US vis-à-vis geopolitical lawfare
2.3.2 Lawfare and the People's Republic of China
2.3.3 The Russian Federation and lawfare
2.4 Geopolitical lawfare methods in the international arena
2.4.1 Sanctions
2.4.2 Lawfare through intergovernmental organisations
2.4.3 Discursive lawfare
2.5 Conclusion
3 Domestic lawfare
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Related concepts
3.2.1 Judicialisation of politics
3.2.2 Power, law, and the state of exception
3.3 The effects of domestic lawfare on liberal democratic regimes
3.4 Applications of domestic lawfare
3.4.1 Soft domestic lawfare in Hungary and Poland?
3.4.2 Domestic lawfare in Latin America
3.5 Conclusion
4 Lawfare and territorial conflicts
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Rule of law in territorial conflicts
4.3 The legal dispossession of Native Americans
4.3.1 Situation
4.3.2 Analysis
4.3.3 Implications
4.4 State lawfare in Northern Ireland
4.4.1 Situation
4.4.2 Analysis
4.4.3 Implications
4.5 State lawfare in the Basque Country
4.5.1 Situation
4.5.2 Analysis
4.5.3 Implications
4.6 State lawfare in Catalonia
4.6.1 Situation
4.6.2 Analysis
4.6.3 Implications
4.7 Conclusion
5 Asymmetric lawfare: a weapon of the weak
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Civil society lawfare
5.3 Civil society lawfare: cases
5.3.1 The Ogoni case
5.3.2 The Dakota Access Pipeline protests
5.4 Lawfare from 'weak' governmental actors
5.5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Index