Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Poetical Works of Geoffrey Chaucer: Memoir of Chaucer, by Sir Harris Nicolas. Essay On the Language and Versification of Chaucer, by T. Tyrwhitt.]( "The Poetical Works of Geoffrey Chaucer: Memoir of Chaucer, by Sir Harris Nicolas. Essay On the Language and Versification of Chaucer, by T. Tyrwhitt.")
The Poetical Works of Geoffrey Chaucer: Memoir of Chaucer, by Sir Harris Nicolas. Essay On the Language and Versification of Chaucer, by T. Tyrwhitt.37,99 €![James Joyce and the Difference of Language]( "James Joyce and the Difference of Language")
James Joyce and the Difference of Language97,99 €![The Worlding of Jean Rhys]( "The Worlding of Jean Rhys")
The Worlding of Jean Rhys95,99 €![The Aspirations of Jean Servien]( "The Aspirations of Jean Servien")
The Aspirations of Jean Servien14,99 €![The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language]( "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language")
The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language76,99 €![The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language]( "The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language")
The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language27,99 €![Modernism, Male Friendship, and the First World War]( "Modernism, Male Friendship, and the First World War")
Modernism, Male Friendship, and the First World War47,99 €
How did Chaucer, Dante, and Jean de Meun represent medieval debates on the origin and history of language?
Medieval commentaries on the origin and history of language used biblical history, from Creation to the Tower of Babel, as their starting-point, and described the progressive impairment of an originally perfect language. Biblical and classical sources raised questions for both medieval poets and commentators about the nature of language, its participation in the Fall, and its possible redemption. John M. Fyler focuses on how three major poets - Chaucer, Dante, and Jean de Meun - participated in these debates about language. He offers new analyses of how the history of language is described and debated in the Divine Comedy, the Canterbury Tales and the Roman de la Rose. While Dante follows the Augustinian idea of the Fall and subsequent redemption of language, Jean de Meun and Chaucer are skeptical about the possibilities for linguistic redemption and resign themselves, at least half-comically, to the linguistic implications of the Fall and the declining world.
Table of contents:
1. The Biblical history of language; 2. Love and language in Jean de Meun; 3. Dante and Chaucer's Dante; 4. The prison-house of language; Primary sources; Bibliography.
Medieval commentaries on the origin and history of language used biblical history, from Creation to the Tower of Babel, as their starting-point, and described the progressive impairment of an originally perfect language. Biblical and classical sources raised questions for both medieval poets and commentators about the nature of language, its participation in the Fall, and its possible redemption. John M. Fyler focuses on how three major poets - Chaucer, Dante, and Jean de Meun - participated in these debates about language. He offers new analyses of how the history of language is described and debated in the Divine Comedy, the Canterbury Tales and the Roman de la Rose. While Dante follows the Augustinian idea of the Fall and subsequent redemption of language, Jean de Meun and Chaucer are skeptical about the possibilities for linguistic redemption and resign themselves, at least half-comically, to the linguistic implications of the Fall and the declining world.
Table of contents:
1. The Biblical history of language; 2. Love and language in Jean de Meun; 3. Dante and Chaucer's Dante; 4. The prison-house of language; Primary sources; Bibliography.