Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Closer Look at Pronunciation Learning Strategies]( "A Closer Look at Pronunciation Learning Strategies")
A Closer Look at Pronunciation Learning Strategies32,99 €![ESL Learners Learning Styles]( "ESL Learners Learning Styles")
ESL Learners Learning Styles51,99 €![ESL Students' Learning Motivations and Strategies]( "ESL Students' Learning Motivations and Strategies")
ESL Students' Learning Motivations and Strategies32,99 €![Washback of an Oral Exam on Teaching and Learning in Germany]( "Washback of an Oral Exam on Teaching and Learning in Germany")
Washback of an Oral Exam on Teaching and Learning in Germany38,99 €![Language Learning Beliefs]( "Language Learning Beliefs")
Language Learning Beliefs44,99 €![Poetic Speech in Carl Sandburg's Rootabaga Stories]( "Poetic Speech in Carl Sandburg's Rootabaga Stories")
Poetic Speech in Carl Sandburg's Rootabaga Stories32,99 €![THE ROLE OF LEXICAL COHESION IN L2 READING COMPREHENSION]( "THE ROLE OF LEXICAL COHESION IN L2 READING COMPREHENSION")
THE ROLE OF LEXICAL COHESION IN L2 READING COMPREHENSION51,99 €
Adult L2 learners may have difficulty in perceiving and producing certain segmental L2 sounds even at the ultimate learning stage. Flege s (1995) Speech Learning Model (SLM) attempts to explain this persistent difficulty in terms of the perceived distance between an L2 sound and the closest L1 sound. Brown s (1997, 1998, 2000) feature model, on the other hand, considers lack of a relevant feature in L1 feature geometry as the cause of the difficulty. This work aims to find out which of the competing models, the SLM or the feature model, can most legitimately account for the ultimate attainment of segmental L2 speech learning for adult L2 learners by examining the perception and production of English segments by Japanese native speakers. The research shows that it is the SLM, but not the feature model, that can successfully account for the ultimate attainment of segmental L2 speech learning for adult L2 learners.